Dania Jai Alai 2017 Winter Season Final Standings Sorted by Wins and Wins by Position

Dania provides its final standings sorted by the number worn by the player. It might be interesting to look at this in a couple of other ways. Below are two sorts that I did that might be more entertaining (and maybe a little more enlightening). The first is a simple win sort. The second is a win sort by player position (front or back court).

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins.

Key:

Player Number-Player-Games-Wins-Places-Shows-Winning%-In the Money%-Position (F=Forward, B=Back).

Note: players tied for number of wins are sorted by winning percentage.

11 Erik       521 134 83 62 .257 .536 F

59 Leke      585 109 73 79 .186 .446 B
20 Iturbide  582 96 64 72 .165 .399  F
38 Urbieta   566 95 84 63 .168 .428  B
46 Arrieta    552 78 64 66 .141 .377  F

27 Aimar     517 77 60 72 .149 .404  F
28 Arbe       560 75 74 72 .134 .395  F
67 Bailo      567 74 84 69 .131 .400  B
22 Diego     499 72 62 54 .144 .377  F
31 Jairo       538 68 55 60 .126 .340  F

49 Amigorena  558 67 59 77 .120 .364  B
18 Chasio         520 62 65 66 .119 .371  B
54 Zulaika        480 60 70 68 .125 .413  F
25 Foronda       410 57 51 56 .139 .400  F
56 Zabala         523 57 60 74 .109 .365  B

42 Barandika  566 56 81 78 .099 .380  F
69 Goitia        380 55 44 50 .145 .392  F
62 Garita        413 55 65 52 .133 .416  B
47 Xabat         549 55 77 65 .100 .359  F
98 Elgezabal   556 54 73 70 .097 .354  B

30 Larrea     527 53 56 60 .101 .321  B
39 Israel       342 51 37 40 .149 .374  B
60 Salegi      460 51 60 58 .111 .367  B
15 Ibon         549 48 61 67 .087 .321  B
19 Minte       494 43 53 60 .087 .316  B

89 Urtaran    537 41 53 80 .076 .324  B
23 Ithurria     279 38 37 29 .136 .373  F
29 Manex      306 37 48 38 .121 .402  B
50 Elizalde    444 30 54 45 .068 .291  B
14 Arta          429 26 38 62 .061 .294  F

12 Beitia     301 24 41 40 .080 .349  F
26 Jagoba    250 22 34 16 .088 .288  F

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins by position.

Front Court

11 Erik       521 134 83 62 .257 .536 F

20 Iturbide  582 96 64 72 .165 .399  F
46 Arrieta    552 78 64 66 .141 .377  F
27 Aimar     517 77 60 72 .149 .404  F
28 Arbe       560 75 74 72 .134 .395  F

22 Diego        499 72 62 54 .144 .377  F
31 Jairo          538 68 55 60 .126 .340  F
54 Zulaika      480 60 70 68 .125 .413  F
25 Foronda     410 57 51 56 .139 .400  F
42 Barandika  566 56 81 78 .099 .380  F

69 Goitia     380 55 44 50 .145 .392  F
47 Xabat      549 55 77 65 .100 .359  F
23 Ithurria    279 38 37 29 .136 .373  F
14 Arta        429 26 38 62 .061 .294  F
12 Beitia      301 24 41 40 .080 .349  F

26 Jagoba     250 22 34 16 .088 .288  F

Back Court

59 Leke          585 109 73 79 .186 .446 B

38 Urbieta       566 95 84 63 .168 .428  B
67 Bailo           567 74 84 69 .131 .400  B
49 Amigorena   558 67 59 77 .120 .364  B
18 Chasio         520 62 65 66 .119 .371  B

56 Zabala       523 57 60 74 .109 .365  B
62 Garita        413 55 65 52 .133 .416  B
98 Elgezabal  556 54 73 70 .097 .354  B
30 Larrea       527 53 56 60 .101 .321  B
39 Israel         342 51 37 40 .149 .374  B

60 Salegi        460 51 60 58 .111 .367  B
15 Ibon           549 48 61 67 .087 .321  B
19 Minte         494 43 53 60 .087 .316  B
89 Urtaran       537 41 53 80 .076 .324  B
29 Manex        306 37 48 38 .121 .402  B


50 Elizalde      444 30 54 45 .068 .291  B

Back to the update

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta--Miami Jai Alai April 9, Game 4--complete enhanced linescore

Full match video of Miami Jai Alai Game 4, April 9, 2017

I decided to try my hand at scoring a quiniela match. It was a very difficult task. Normally I would not be able to do this because live scoring is beyond my capability and Dania, which offers live matches, does not offer them free on demand. Miami matches are pay per view. Since I had a Youtube video of a complete game (a video which only lasted a little over 12 minutes), I could stop the video at any time and study points to either verify or change my judgments. But there are other problems with scoring a Quiniela match. In this video, the order of the matchups was not posted on the screen, so I had to pay careful attention to keep the matchups correct. For Miami, that is not so easy. Some uniforms are so bleached out it is hard to tell color. Some players do not have numbers or names on their backs. I used the player list shown at the beginning of the video to decipher who was who. I think I got it right, but there might be mistakes in this game "map." Enjoy, and please let me know if you find any mistakes.

Winner-error judgments are my own, based on my limited knowledge of the game, as well as  player body language. I am a "generous" scorer, as, on a close call, a winner makes two players happy, and an error makes two players angry. My basic rule is like that used in baseball scoring of hits or errors. Could the play be reasonably expected to be made by a professional player?

Key: Team # Serving-(Team points); Team # Receiving (Team points); Number of balls in play; (Team # that won the point); Player +=winner +a=service ace - = error; selected comments, time of the point on the video. Note that in the first round 1 point is awarded. All subsequent rounds award 2. Game 4 is played to 9 points.

* Possible Game Point

Teams: 1 Sierra-Sierra II  2. Tevin-Ubilla  3. Jon-Garro  4. Jabe-Ladutxeb5. Berikua-Aldazabal 6. Aizarna-Santiso57. Zinkunegi-Arriza sl8. Aritz-Spinnersl
First
First Round

1(0)-2(0); 12(2); Tevin +; 6:02--7:34
2(1)-3(0); 14(3); Garro +; 1:40--2:34
3(1)-4(0); 3(3); Jon +; 2:46--3:01
3(2)-5(0); 1(3); Jon +a; 3:05--3:13
3(3)-6(0); 4(6); Aizarna +; (dejada); 3:19--3:37
6(1)-7(0); 25(6); Santiso +; 3:50--5:36
6(2)-8(0); 4(8); Aritz +; (cortada past Aizarna); 5:39--5:55

Second Round

8(1)-1(0); 21(8) Aritz +;  (chic chac or chula); 6:02--7:34
8(3)-2(1); 2(2); Aritz -;  (a simple dropped catch); 7:36--7:42
2(3)-4(0); 7(2); Jabi -; 7:49--8:23
2(5)-5(0); 3(2); Tevin +; (two wall); 8:34--8:47
2(7)*-3(3); 2(3); Jon +; (two wall); 8:50-8:56
3(5)-7(0); 6(7); Jon -; 9:07--9:35
7(2)-6(2); 4(6); Aizarna +; (nice shot to the outside); 9:35--9:57

Third Round

6(4)-1(0); 6(1); Sierra II +; 9:58--10:26
1(2)-8(3); 2(8); Spinner +; 10:35--10:45
8(5)-4(0); 14(4); Jabe +; 10:48--11:48
4(2)-5(0); 1(4); Jabe +a; 11:56--12:02
4(4)-2(7)*; 4(2) Ubilla +; 12:08--12:29

2: Tevin-Ubilla win

3(5)-8(5); 6(8); Aritz +; 12:40--13:07

8: Aritz-Spinner Place
3: Jon-Garro Show

6(4)-4(4); 6(4) Jabi +; 13:14--14:13

4: Jabi-Ladutxe finish 4th

2-8-3-4

Miami Jai Alai Results for April 9, 2017

Balls in play: 147

Teams "in the money" (to 4th place) actual point scores

2. Tevin-Ubilla 5-2
8. Aritz-Spinner 4-2
3. Aizarna-Santiso 4-3
4. Jon-Garro 2-3

21 points contested

Individual scoring:

Aritz +3 -1
Jabe +3 -1
Jon +3 -1
Aizarna +2
Tevin +2
Garro +1
Santiso +1
Sierra II +1
Spinner +1
Ubilla +1

Add up all the numbers (+ and -) as they all led to points. They add to 21.

Back to the update

j  Jon-Garrow3. Jo

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta--2016 Dania Team Jai Alai Competition, from beginning to end

Dania Jai Alai began its Team Jai Alai competition on the weekend of October 7 (Evening) and 8 (Matinee and Evening). The competition ended on the weekend of December 9 (Evening) and 10 (Matinee and Evening).  The teams were all from the Dania roster but represented Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Dania Beach. 30 games were played each weekend. A win was worth 5 points, place was worth 3 points, and show was worth 1 point. At the end of the competition cash prizes were given. The running team standings and individual points contributed statistics are given below. Note that individual points obviously add to more than team totals because doubles points are counted twice. I made no attempt to identify singles victories. I also made no attempt to note how many games each player participated in, what the post positions were, or who the doubles partners were. In this competition, for the most part, pairs stayed the same throughout a performance. It was unknown if the captains had any control over the pairings. The variables I have left out are all in the entries and results pages for the three performances, if you want to find out. Corrections for any errors you may find will be welcomed and changes made. I took this competition seriously because I think there is much hidden information about the roster to be found in it. Money does talk.

Singles games are 1,4,7,10, all doubles games to 7 pts except G9, which is to 9 pts:

---------------------------------------------------------

Note: read up from the bottom of the page to follow the tournament in chronological order. Team and individual player summaries for each week are at the very bottom of this page.

---------------------------------------------------------

Summary Week10 (Final): December 9-10, 3 performances: Friday Dec. 9 (Evening); Saturday Dec. 10 (Matinee), Saturday Dec. 10 (Evening)

Team: Hollywood dominated the final two performances of the 10th and final week and won the team tournament in smashing fashion. The 10th week was played for double points (W=10, P=6, S=2) in order to spice up the competition and give Fort Lauderdale and Dania Beach a chance to get back into the race. The schedule was set up so that FL would have a 1 post advantage over Hollywood in the Friday night performance and the top two teams would  have equal posts in the Saturday Matinee. Hollywood would get its 1 post advantage on Saturday evening. Here is the actual scoring, game by game. Hollywood went into this week leading by 57 points. After each game, the size of the lead is given (rather than the actual score, because, like cricket, when the scores are this high it is easier and more informative to only give the difference).

12/9(E) H, FL, DB H+57

G1(0,2,16--H+55); G2(0,8,10--H+47);  G3(6,12,0--H+41); G4(12,0,6--H+53); G5(2,10,6--H+45); G6(0,16,2--H+29); G7(0,10,8--H+19); G8(10,8,0--H+21); G9(0,6,12--H+15); G10(8,10,0--H+13)

12/10(M) H, FL, DB H+13

G1(10,6,2--H+17); G2(12,6,0--H+23); G3(10,2,6--H+31); G4(0,8,10--H+23); G5(6,12,0--H+17); G6(10,2,6--H+25); G7(6,0,12--H+31); G8(18,0,0--H+49); G9(6,2,10--H+53); G10(18,0,0--H+71)

12/10(E) H, FL, DB H+71

G1(10,6,2--H+75); G2(10,6,2--H+79); G3(6,10,2--H+75); G4(10,6,2--H+79); G5(10,2,6--H+87); ***G6(6,0,12--H+93) Hollywood clinches the championship***; G7(10,2,6--H+101); G8(6,2,10--H+105); G9(12,6,0--H+111); G10(10,0,8--H+121)

Led by Foronda's 3 wins Fort Lauderdale used their 1 post advantage over Hollywood to roar back into contention Friday night. They outscored Hollywood in 8 of the 10 games. This made the Saturday Matinee (both teams at equal post strength) crucial. FL needed to win big and get a cushion for the Evening performance where they would be at a 1 post disadvantage. They were holding their own in the early games. Then the Hollywood hammer came down. They added 46 points to their lead in the last 5 games. G8 and G10 were emphatic shutouts that basically won the tournament. The two shutouts shared an unlikely scenario. Diego, Hollywood's captain, had crucial service faults in each. In G8 he was serving possible game point (with Chasio) to Aimar-Urturan. The fault handed Hollywood's fate to A-U, who proceeded to win. D-C finished 2nd and Arrieta-Ibon 3rd. In G10 Diego faulted earlier, giving the baton to Aimar, who cruised until he met Arrieta. In one of the best points of the entire weekend, Arrieta prevailed. He won the game. Aimar finished 2nd. In a playoff for 3rd against Zulaika (DB-c), Diego served an ace to sweep the game for Hollywood. Hollywood completely dominated the Evening performance, winning 4 of the first 5 games. In a very fitting way to end the competition Aimar-Salegi, Hollywood's top front and back court total scorers won game 5, all but clinching the championship. In the final 15 games, Hollywood lost ground to FL twice. Dania Beach ended a disappointing campaign in last place, a little short of 200 points behind Hollywood.

Individual: Minte (FL-b) led all scorers this week with 70 points. Arrieta (H-f) was 2nd with 66. Erik (FL-f-c) won the overall scoring title with 284 points. Salegi (H-b), the surprise of the tournament, led the back court with 217. Hollywood's front court trio of Aimar (234), Arrieta (209), and Diego (c) (190), along with Salegi, played a major part in their championship. No other team had more than one player with 200 points. Eric dominated the tournament until he finally slowed down toward the close. In the end, too little support from the rest of his front court was too much for FL to overcome. Though it came in a disappointing context, Zulaika's (DB-f-c) 39 point (including 5 wins in the Saturday Evening performance) Week 8, was the best single performance of the tournament. If I was to name a most valuable player, it would be Salegi. Week after week, especially in the later weeks, he helped set the tone for his team's performance by his excellent, hustling play in the early games. A great image is that of him winning one of his last games with a falling rebote from the apron. Neither Egiguren nor Olharan could have done it better.

TEAM

Hollywood: 1,093pts.

*WK 10: 224pts. 12/9(E) 38; 12/10(M) 96; 12/10(E) 90: 1,093(1)

WK 9: 107pts. 12/2(E) 47; 12/3(M) 37; 12/3(E) 23:        869(1)
WK 8:  83pts. 11/25(E) 43; 11/26(M) 23; 11/26(E) 17:    762(1)
WK 7:  107pts. 11/18(E) 23; 11/19(M) 38; 11/19(E) 46:  679(1)
WK 6: 116pts. 11/11(E) 41; 11/12(M) 49; 11/12(E) 26:  572(1)
WK 5: 115pts. 11/4(E) 53; 11/5(M) 26; 11/5(E) 36:        456(2)
WK 4: 103pts. 10/28(E) 34; 10/29(M) 43 10/29(E) 26:  341(3)
WK 3: 77pts. 10/14(E) 31; 10/15(M) 28; 10/15(E) 18:   238(3)
WK 2: 70pts. 10/14(E) 23; 10/15(M) 17; 10/15(E) 30:   161(3)
WK 1: 91pts. 10/7(E) 22; 10/8(M) 44 10/8(E) 25:           91(2)

Fort Lauderdale: 972pts.

*WK 10: 160pts. (12/9(E) 82; 12/10(M) 38; 12/10(E) 40:  972(2)

WK 9:  81pts.  12/2(E) 20; 12/3(M) 22; 12/3(E) 39:         812(2)
WK 8: 105pts. 11/25(E) 38; 11/26(M) 45; 11/26(E) 22:    731(2)
WK 7:  83pts.  11/18(E) 36; 11/19(M) 31; 11/19(E) 16:    626(2)
WK 6:  66pts.  11/11(E) 19; 11/12(M) 23; 11/12(E) 24:    543(2)
WK 5:  88pts.  11/4(E) 22; 11/5(M) 42; 11/5(E) 24:          477(1)
WK 4:  90pts.  10/28(E) 36;  10/29(M) 23; 10/29(E) 31:  389 (1)
WK 3:  91pts.  10/21(E) 16;  10/22(M) 31; 10/22(E) 44:  299 (1)
WK 2: 114pts. 10/14(E) 58; 10/15(M) 32; 10/15(E) 24:   208 (1)
WK 1: 94pts.   10/7(E) 37; 10/8(M) 14 10/8(E) 43:            94 (1)

Dania Beach: 905pts.

*WK 10: 156 pts. 12/10(E) 60; 12/11(M) 46; 12/11(E) 50: 905(3)

WK 9: 82pts. 12/2(E) 23; 12/3(M) 31; 12/3(E) 28:        749(3)
WK 8: 82pts. 11/25(E) 9; 11/26(M) 22; 11/26(E) 51:     667(3)
WK 7: 80pts.  11/18(E) 31; 11/19( M) 21; 11/19(E) 28: 585(3)
WK 6: 88pts.  11/11(E) 30; 11/12(M) 18; 11/12(E) 40:  505(3)
WK 5: 67pts.  11/4(E) 15; 11/5(M) 22; 11/5(E) 30:        417(3)
WK 4: 77pts.  10/28(E) 20; 10/29(M) 24: 10/29(E) 33: 350(2)
WK 3: 102pts. 10/21(E) 43; 10/22(M) 31; 10/22(E) 28: 273(2)
WK 2: 86pts. 10/14(E)  9; 10/15(M) 41; 10/15(E) 36 :   171(2)
WK 1: 85pts. 10/7(E) 31; 10/8(M) 32 10/8(E) 22:           85(3)

*Points were doubled in Week 10 making it, for all practical purposes, a final.

INDIVDUAL

Players key: W=wins:5pts; P=place:3pts; S=Show:1pt; DNP=Did not play

Note 1: DNP, throughout the tournament meant either scratched or not scheduled. Not scheduled meant exactly what it said or out due to injury. I made no distinction between any of the possibilities. Scratched most likely, but not necessarily, meant injured. See Dania Beach scratch sheets (which cover, at this time, Nov. 1 on). Note Tiger's caveat on the scratch sheets.

Note 2: Points were doubled in Week 10.

Note 3: Use these individual statistics as a point of departure, perhaps no more than an impression.  There are likely to be errors in them. The errors could be errors of addition, which are easy to fix, or errors in assignment of points, which are not so easy to fix. I went through the results pages each week in order to compile the points. If you try going through the Dania results pages, you'll see how easy it is to pull up the wrong date, or compile for evenings when you meant to be compiling for matinees because when you hit the results on the date, you sometimes get the matinee and sometimes the evening, seemingly at random. Occasionally the slickness of design of  Dania's web pages gets in the way of providing simple, easy to access information. That said, all errors are my responsibility. Any corrections will be happily accepted and, on verification, incorporated.

Erik (FL-c) led all front courters in scoring. Salegi (H) led all back courters.

Hollywood (1,093 pts)

Front Court

Aimar: 234pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 2W(20) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 1W(10); 1S(2): 48pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 3W(15) 1P (3); 12/3(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(E) DNP: 22pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2P(6) 2S(2); 11/26(M) 2S(2); 11/26(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 14pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) DNP; 11/19(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 0: 9pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/12(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5): 23pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 3W(15) 1P(3) 2S(2): 11/5(M) 2P(6) 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 35pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/29(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 28pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 2S(2); 10/22(E) 1S(1): 11pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 2S(2): 11pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2P(6) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 2W(10) 2P(6) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 33pts.

Arrieta: 209pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 2W(20) 2P(12) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 2W(20):  66pts.

WK9: 12/2(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1W(5): 17pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/26(M) DNP; 11/26(E) 0; 10pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5); 11/19(M) 0; 11/19(E) 4W(20) 1S(1): 26pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/12(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5) 2P(6): 19pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 2P(6) 2S(2): 11/5(M) 1P(3) 2S(2): 11/5(E) 1W(5) 2P(6): 24pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) DNP; 10/29(M) 1P(3); 10/29(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 1W(5); 10/15(E) 1P(3): 12pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/8(E) 1P(3) 3S(3): 20pts.

Diego (c): 190pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1P(6); 12/10(M) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 1W(10) 3P(18): 42pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 0; 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1W(5): 13pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/26(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/26(E) 1P(3): 21pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 2W(10); 11/19(E) 1W(5) 2P(6): 22pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5); 11/12(M) 1P(3); 11/12(E) 1S: 9pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0: 11/5(M) 1P(3); 11/5(E) 1S(1): 4pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 3(S): 22pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 2W(10) 3S(3); 10/22(M) 2P(6); 10/22(E) 1P(3): 22pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1W(5); 10/15(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1): 27pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1P(3); 10/8/(E) 1S(1): 8pts.

Arbe: 128pts.

WK10: DNP

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 2W(10) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1P(3): 18pts
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2P(6); 11/26(M) 0; 11/26(E) 2P(6); 12pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 2P(6); 11/19(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/19(E)  1P(3) 1S(1): 19pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/12(M) 2W(10) 1P(5) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5): 26pts.
WK 5: DNP
WK 4: 10/28(E) 0; 10/29(M) 3W(15); 10/29(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 23pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 1P(3): 14pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 0: 1pt.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2W(10); 10/8(M) 0 10/8(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 15pts.

Anndy: 49pts.

WK 10: DNP

WK9: 12/2(E) 0; 12/3(M) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 8: DNP
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 0; 11/19(E) 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3); 11/12(M) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 2S(2): 17pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/4(M) 0; 11/5(E): 0: 9pts
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 2S(2); 10/29(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 0: 13pts.
WK 3: DNP
WK 2: DNP
WK 1: DNP

Iturbide: 38pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 1W(10); 12/10(E) 1W(10): 22pts.

WK 9: DNP
WK 8: DNP

WK 7: DNP
WK 6: DNP
WK 5: DNP
WK 4: DNP
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 1P(3) 10/22(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 0; 10/15(M) 2S(2); 10/15(E) 2S(2): 4pts.
WK 1: DNP

Back Court

Salegi: 217pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10); 12/10(M) 1W(10) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 1W(10): 32pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 4W(20); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1W(5): 31pts
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1S(1): 21pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 3W(15); 11/19(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1): 30pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 2W(10) 1P(3); 11/12(M); 1W(5) 2P(6); 1S(1); 11/12(E) 2S(2): 27pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1P(3); 11/4(M) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S(3); 11/5(E) 0: 17pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 2W(10); 10/29(M) 1W(5); 10/29(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 19pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1W(5); 10/22(E) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 9/15(M) 1S(1); 9/15(E) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5); 9/8(M) 1W(5) 2P(6); 9/8(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 20pts.

Chasio: 169pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10); 12/10(M) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 2W(20) 1P(6) 1S(2): 44pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1W(5); 12/3(E) DNP: 11pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2S(2); 11/26(M) 0; 11/26(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 6pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5): 11/19(M) 2W(10); 11/19(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 24pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E); 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/12(M) 1P(3); 11/12(E); 2P(6): 14pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 3W(15) 1P(3) 1S(1) 11/5(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/5(E) 1S(1): 24pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) DNP; 10/29(M) 1P(3) 10/29(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 8pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 1P(3) 2S(2); 10/22(E) 0: 8pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 2P(6); 10/15(M) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 2S(2): 19pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1P(3); 10/8(E) 1W(5) 2S(2): 11pts.

Urturan: 153pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 0; 12/10(M) 3W(30); 12/10(E) 1W(10): 40pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 0; 12/3(E) 1W(5); 14pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E)  2P(6);  11/26(M) DNP; 11/26(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 10pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) DNP; 11/19(M) 0; 11/19(E) 2P(6): 6pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/12(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 0; 8pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/5(M) 2P(6); 11/5(E) 0: 11pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 2W(10); 10/29(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 24pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 2S(2); 10/22(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1S (1) 7pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1W(5); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 2S(2): 20pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 0; 10/8(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/8(E) 0: 13pts.

Ibon: 136pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) DNP; 12/10(M) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 2P(12): 20pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1W(5): 12pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/26(M) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 2S(2); 11pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 0: 11/19(M) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 2(W)(10) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 11/12(M) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S(1) 11/12(E) 1W(5): 22pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 0; 11/5(E) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 1W(5) 2S(2); 10/29(E) 1W(5): 20pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5); 10/22(M) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 0: 8pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 0; 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 1P(3): 3pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1P(3) 3S(3): 16pts.

Larrea: 133pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 1W(10) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 0: 24pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 0; 12/3(M) 2P(6); 12/3(E) 1P(3): 9pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1P(3): 18pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1(P) 3; 11/19(M) 1P(3); 11/19(E) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/12(M) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 20pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/5(M) 1P(3) 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(1) 2S(2): 25pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 0; 10/29(M) 0; 10/29(E) 0: 0pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 1W(5); 10/22(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 2S(2); 10/15(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2P(6) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1P(2): 10pts.

Fort Lauderdale (972pts)

Front Court

Erik (c): 284pts

WK 10: 12/9(E) 3P(18); 12/10(M); 1W(10) 2S(4); 12/10(E) 1W(10) 2P(12) 1S(2): 56 pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) DNP; 12/3(M) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1): 15pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2W(10); 11/26(M) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1W(5) 2S(2): 18pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E); 2W(10); 11/19(M) 2P(6) 2S(2): 11/19(E) 2S(2): 20pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5); 11/12(M) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 25pts
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/5(M) 4W(20); 11/5(E): 1S(1): 32pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 2W(10): 18pts
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 3W(15): 28pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 3W(15) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 2W(10) 3S(3); 10/15(E)1W(5) 2S(2): 38pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5); 1P(3); 1S(1): 10/8(M) 2W(10) 1S(1): 10/8(E) 1W(5) 3P(9): 34pts.

Foronda: 148pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 3W(30) 2S(4); 12/10(M) 2S(4); 12/10(E) 1S(2): 40pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) 1W(5); 12/3(E) 1P(3): 13pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 11/26(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 11/26(E) 0: 21pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/19(M) 2W(10); 11/19(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 25pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/12(M) 1W(5); 11/12(E) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1P(3); 11/5(M) 0; 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) DNP; 10/22(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/23(E) 2W(10) 1P(3): 17pts.
WK 2: DNP
WK 1: DNP

Goitia: 126pts.

WK 10:  DNP

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1S(1): 25pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5); 11/26(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1P(3):  14pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 1P(3) 1S(1) ; 11/19(E) 1S(1): 11pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 2S(2); 11/5(M) 1P(3); 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 13pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E); 1S(1); 11/5(M) 2S(2); 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 11pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 0; 10/29(M) 1P(3); 10/29(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 2W(10): 11pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 2W(10) 2S(2); 10/15(M) 2P(6); 10/15(E) 1P(3): 21pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1P(3); 10/8(M) 0; 10/8(E) 1W(5): 8pts.

Jairo: 100pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 0: 24pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) DNP; 12/3(E) DNP: 5pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1P(3); 11/26(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 0: 9pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1P(3); 11/19(M) DNP; 11/19(E) 0; 3pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) DNP; 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 1P(2): 2pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5); 11/5(M) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/5(E) 0: 16pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 2P(6) 1S(1);  10/29(M) DNP; 10/29(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 2P(6); 10/15(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 1W(5): 15pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5); 10/8(M) 0; 10/8(E) 2W(10): 15pts.

Arta: 82pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 0; 12/10(M) 0; 12/10(E) DNP: 0pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1P(3); 12/3(M) 0; 12/3(E) 1W(5): 8pts
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 1W(5); 11/26(E); 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 7  11/18(E) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/19(E) 0: 9pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 0; 11/12(M) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 0: 1pt.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 1P(3); 11/5(E) 1S(1): 4pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 2W(10) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1P(3) 10/29(E) 1W(5): 19pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 2(P) 6; 10/22(M) 1W(5); 10/22(E) 0: 11pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 1S(1): 5pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2W(10) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 18pts.

Back Court: 

Urbieta: 173pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 2W(20) 1S(2); 12/10(M) 2S(4); 12/10(E) 1P(6): 32pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) 0; 12/3(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 13pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2W(10); 11/26(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 20pts
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/19(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 1P(3): 18pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) DNP; 11/12(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 11/12(E) 1S(1): 14pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 1P(3); 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 9pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 2W(10): 20pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 2W(10): 23pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 0; 10/15(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 12pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1P(3); 10/8(M) 0; 10/8(E) 3P(9): 12pts.

Minte: 166pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10) 1P(6) 2S(4); 12/10(M) 1W(10); 1P(6); 12/10(E) 2W(20) 2P(12) 1S(2): 70pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 2P(6); 12/3(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 16pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5); 11/26(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 18pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/19(M) DNP; 11/19(E) 1W(5): 9pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1S(1); 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) DNP: 1pt
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1S(1); 11/5(M) 3S(3); 11/5(E) 2S(2): 6pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5); 10/29(M) DNP; 10/29(E) 1W(5): 10pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 0; 10/22(E) 0: 0pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 2W(10) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 23pts.

WK 1: 10/7(E) 2P(6); 10/8(M) 2S(2); 10/8(E) 1W(5): 13pts.

Manex: 140pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10) 3P(18); 12/10(M) 2S(4); 12/10(E) 1S(2): 34pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1P(3): 12pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/26(M) 0: 11/26(E) 1W(5): 13pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) DNP; 11/19(E) 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5): 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 0: 5pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 2P(6); 11/5(M) DNP; 11/5(E) 2S(2): 8pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/29(M) DNP; 10/29(E) 0: 6pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 20pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 3W(15) 2S(2); 10/15(M) 2P(6); 10/15(E) 0: 23pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/8(M) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1P(3): 12pts.

Amigorena: 112pts.

WK 10: DNP

WK 9: 12/2(E) DNP; 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1W(5): 13pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1P(3); 11/26(M) 2W(10); 11/26(E) 0: 13pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 0; 11/19(M) 1W(5); 11/19(E) 1S(1): 6pts
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5); 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S(1): 17pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(3); 11/5(M) 3W(15); 11/5(E) DNP: 18pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 0; 10/29(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 0: 4pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1S(1): 5pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1P(3) 1S (1); 10/15(E) 1P(3): 20pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 0; 10/8(M) 2W(10) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 1W(5): 16pts.

Bailo: 99pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1S(2); 12/10(M) DNP; 12/10(E) DNP

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 0; 12/3(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 10pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 2W(10); 11/26(E) DNP: 11pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 11/19(E) 1P(3): 15pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3); 11/12(M) 1P(3); 11/12(E) 1P(3): 9pts
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1P(3); 11/5(M) 2W(10) 1P(3): 11/5(E) 1P(3): 19pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 2P(6); 10/29(M) 2P(6); 10/29(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 16pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1P(3) 2S(2); 10/22(E) 1W(5): 14pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) DNP; 10/15(M) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 1: DNP

Elizalde: 75pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 0 12/10(M) 1P(6) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 0: 8pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) DNP; 12/3(M) 1W(5); 12/3(E) 0: 5pts
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1P(1); 11/26(M) 1W(5); 11/26(E) 1P(3): 9pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1P(3); 11/19(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 6: DNP
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 0; 11/5(E) 1P(3): 3pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 0; 10/29(E) 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 2W(10): 11pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 2W(10); 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 0: 10pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 0; 10/8(E) 1W(5): 14pts.

Dania Beach (905pts)

Front Court

Zulaika (c): 197pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10); 12/10(M) 1W(10); 12/10(E) 1W(10); 1P(6) 1S(2): 38pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 3S(3); 12/3(E) 1W(5) 2P(6) 2S(2): 25pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 0; 11/26(M) 1W(5) 2P(6); 11/26(E) 5W(25) 1P(3): 39pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 2P(6); 11/19(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 2P(6): 19pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 2W(10): 20pts
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1S(1); 11/5(M) 1W(5); 11/5(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 14pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 0; 10/29(E) 2P(6): 10pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5); 10/22/(M) 2W(10); 10/22(E) 0: 15pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S (1); 10/15(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 0: 10pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1P(3) 10/8(M) 0; 10/8(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 7pts.

Barandika: 160pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 2S(4); 12/10(M) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 1W(10) 1P(6): 26pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 2P(6) 2S(2); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 21pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 3S(6): 11/26(E) 0: 7pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 0; 11/19(E) 1W(5): 9pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1P(3); 11/12(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 15pts
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 1P(3) 2S(2); 11/5(E) 3W(15): 20pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1) 10/29(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 18pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5) 2P(6) 1S)1; 10/22(M) 0; 10/22(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 16pts.
WK 2: 10/4(E) 0; 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 2W(10): 10pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2W(10) 1S(1); 10/8(M) S(2); 10/8(E) 1W(5): 18pts.

Ithurria: 151pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1P(6); 12/10(M) 0; 12/10(E) DNP: 6pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 11pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 8pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 2S(2); 11/19(M) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 2W(10) 1P(3): 21pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 2W(10); 11/12(M) 2W(10); 11/12(E) 1W(5) 3P(9) 1S(1): 35pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5); 11/5(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/5(E) 0: 11pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 2P(6); 10/29(E) 2P(6): 20pts
WK3: 10/21(E) 2S(2); 10/22(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/23(E) 2P(6) 1S(1): 17pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 2P(6); 22pts.
WK 1: DNP

Xabat: 91pts.
WK 10: 12/9(E) 1W(10) 1P(6): 12/10(M) DNP; 12/10(E) 0: 16pts.

WK 9: DNP
WK 8: DNP
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 1S(1) 11/19(E) 1P(3): 10pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 0; 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) DNP: 0pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1P(3); 11/5(M) 0; 11/5(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 2S(2); 10/29(E) 2W(10): 15pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5); 10/22(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1P(3): 14pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 20pts.

WK 1: 10/7(E) 2S(2); 10/8(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/8(E) 1P(3): 13pts.

Beitia: 31pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 0; 12/10(M) DNP; 12/10(E) 0: 0pts.

WK 9: DNP
WK 8: DNP
WK7:  DNP
WK 6: DNP
WK 5: DNP
WK 4: DNP
WK 3: 10/21(E) 0; 10/22(M) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 7pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 0: 1pt.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5) 2S(2); 10/8(M) 3P(9) 2S(2); 10/8(E) 1W(5): 23pts.

Back Court

Leke: 190pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 2W(20); 12/10(M) 1P(6): 12/10(E) 1P(6) 2S(2): 34pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) 2W(10) 1S(1); 12/3(E) 1W(5) 2P(6) 2S(2): 29pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 3P(6); 11/26(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 15pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/19(M) 1P(3) 2S(2): 11/19(E) DNP: 11pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 0; 11/12(M) 1W(5); 11/12(E) 2P(6) 2S(2): 13pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5); 11/5(M) 0; 11/5(E) 2W(10); 15pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 2S(2); 10/29(E) DNP: 5pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 2W(10) 1P(3) 1(S); 10/22(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/22(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 29 pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1W(5) 2P(6); 10/15(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 18pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 2W(10); 10/8(M) 1W(5) 1P(3) 2S(2); 10/8(E) 1S(1): 21pts.

Israel: 157pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 1P(6): 12/10(M) 1W(10) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 1W(10) 1S(2): 34pts

WK 9: 12/2(E) 2P(6); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 2S(2) ; 12/3(E) 1S(1): 14pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 2S(2); 11/26(M) 2P(6); 11/26(E) 1P(3): 11pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 3P(6): 11/19(M) 1W(5); 11/19(E) 1W(5): 16pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 1W(5) 3S(3): 11/12(M) DNP; 11/12(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 14pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1S(1); 11/5(M) 2S(2); 11/5(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 8pts.
WK4: 10/28(E) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 15pts.
WK3: 10/21(E) 1W(5); 10/22(M) 1W(5); 10/22(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 14pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 0; 10/15(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/15(E) 1P(3); 9pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1P(3) 10/8(E) 2W(10) 1P(3): 22pts.

Zabala: 118pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 2P(6); 12/10(M) DNP; 12/10(E) 0: 6pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 2P(6) 2S(2); 12/3(M) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1P(3) 1S(1): 15pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) DNP; 11/26(M) 0; 11/26(E) 1W(5) 1S(1): 6pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1W(5); 11/19(M) 1S(1); 11/19(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1): 15pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 2W(10) 1P(3); 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 1W(5): 15pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) DNP; 11/5(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/5(E) 1P(3): 9pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1W(5); 10/29(E) 1P(3); 9pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 2W(10); 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 2P(6) 1S(1): 18pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1P(3); 10/15(M) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 1W(5) 1P(3): 14pts.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 0; 10/8(M) 2P(6) 10/8(E) 1W(5): 11pts.

Yeche: 113pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 0; 12/10(M) 1S(2); 12/10(E) 1W(10): 12pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1S(1); 12/3(M) DNP; 12/3(E) 1S(1): 2pts
WK 8: 11/25(E) 1W(5); 11/26(M) 1S(1); 11/26(E) 4W(20) 2P(6): 32pts
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1P(3); 11/19(M) 0; 11/19(E) 0: 3pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 0; 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 1W(5): 5pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 11/5(M) 1W(5); 11/5(E) 1S(1): 15pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 2P(6) 1S(1); 10/29(E) 2W(10): 18pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1S(1); 10/22(M) 1S(1); 10/22(E) 1S(1); 3pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 0; 10/15(M) 2W(10) 1P(3); 10/15(E) 2W(10): 23pts.
WK 1: DNP

Garita: 94pts.

WK 10: 12/9(E) 3S(6); 12/10(M) 1W(10); 12/10(E) 1P(6) 1S(2):  24pts.

WK 9: 12/2(E) 1S(1); 12/3(M) 1W(5) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 14pts.
WK 8: 11/25(E) 0; 11/26(M) 1S(1); 11/26(E): 1P(3): 4pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 1S(1): 11/19(M) 1P(3) 1S(1): 11/19(E) DNP: 5pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 2P(6); 11/12(M) 0; 11/12(E) 1P(3) 2S(2): 11pts.
WK 5: DNP*  *Possible that he did play in 11/5 Matinee, waiting for Dania scratches for 11/5 performances to confirm: 0pts. in any event.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1S(1); 10/29(M) 1W(5); 10/29(E) 2P(6): 12pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1W(5); 10/22(M) 0; 10/22(E) 1P(3): 8pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 0: 1pt.
WK 1: 10/7(E) 1W(5) 1P(3) 1S(1); 10/8(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 10/8(E) 0; 15pts.

Elgezabal: 66pts.

WK10* 12/9(E) 0; 12/10(M) 1P(6); 12/10(E) 1S(2): 8pts.

WK 9*12/2(E) 1W(5); 12/3(M) 1P(3); 12/3(E) 0: 8pts.
WK 8*11/25(E) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/26(M) 0; 11/26(E) 1P(3): 9pts.
WK 7: 11/18(E) 2S(2); 11/19(M) 1P(3); 11/19(E) 1P(3): 8pts.
WK 6: 11/11(E) 0; 11/12(M) 1W(5) 1S(1); 11/12(E) 1W(5): 11pts.
WK 5: 11/4(E) 0; 11/5(M) 1S(1);  11/5(E) 1P(3): 4pts.
WK 4: 10/28(E) 1W(5) 1P(3); 10/29(M) 0; 10/29(E) 0: 8pts.
WK 3: 10/21(E) 1P(3); 10/22(M) 0; 10/22(E) 1P(3): 6pts.
WK 2: 10/14(E) 1S(1); 10/15(M) 0; 10/15(E) 1P(3): 4pts.
WK 1: DNP

*Played in the front court.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: Week 1--Oct. 7-8, 2016:  3 performances Friday 10/7 (Evening); Saturday 10/8 (Matinee); (Evening)

Erik (FL-captain)  led all scorers with partial or full responsibility for 34 points. Aimar (H) was second with 33. The leading back courters were Israel (DB) with 22 and Salegi (H) with 20  Leke (DB) with 21. A couple of interesting items. Aimar (H-front court) had 3 wins, 8 places, and 5 shows for the week. For the team competition he had 3, 5, and 3. Arta (FL-f), who was 5,2,5 for the week, was 3,0,3 for the team competition. Diego (H-c) and Zulaika (DB-c) got off to slow starts with 8 and 7 points respectively.

Summary: Week 2--Oct. 14-15, 2016:  3 performances Friday 10/14 (Evening); Saturday 10/15 (Matinee); (Evening)

Fort Lauderdale had a terrific week 2, stretching its lead from 3 points to 37. It put up the biggest score of the competition so far, 58 points in the 10/14(E) performance. Dania Beach was hampered by the worst score so far, 9 points on 10/14(E). They came back very well in the last two performances to move into 2nd place. Hollywood could score only 70 points for the entire weekend, dropping from 2nd to 3rd. Leading scorer for the week and the competition was Erik (FL-c) (38 and 72). Leading back courters for the week were Manex (FL) and Yeche (DB) with 23. Leke (DB) (39) leads back courters for the tournament. Diego (H-c) had a very productive week after his slow 1st week, with 27 points (35 total), second only to Erik for the week. Zulaika (DB-c) had a second slow week in a row, with only 10 points (17 total). The fact that DB is in second place in spite of their one awful performance and slow start of their captain can be seen as a positive for them.

Summary Week 3: October 21-22. 3 performances. Friday, Oct. 21 (Evening), Saturday Oct. 22 (Matinee); Saturday Oct. 22 (Evening)

Team: By the end of the first performance (10/21(E)) Dania Beach had sliced Fort Lauderdale's overall lead from 37 to 10 points. Their early game players roared out with 4 straight wins along with a place and two shows in the first 4 games. FL answered with 2 places and a show in the same 4 games. The two teams equaled each other in the second performance (10/22(M)), but then in the last performance (10/22(E)), FL got 16 of those points back, with wins in the last 6 games, along with 1 place and 1 show. In those last 6 games, Dania Beach took all the 2nd places except for one. Hollywood was basically shut out of those games, finishing on a downward spiral that left them 61 points off the lead, and 26 points behind FL. Hollywood's 103 points for the weekend was the second most for any weekend in the tournament so far.

Individual: Erik (c-FL) had another stellar week. He was in the middle of his team's huge run on Saturday night, claiming 3 of the 6 wins. His 5 wins for the weekend got him to 100 points, the first player to get there. He leads second place Leke (DB) by 32 points.  Leke got the most points for the weekend, with 29. Erik was second with 28. Diego (c-H) continued moving up, and now leads his team in scoring, and is 3rd overall with 57 points. Zulaika (c-DB) improved, scoring almost as many points over the weekend as he had in the first two weeks combined.

Summary Week 4: October 28-29. 3 performances. Friday, Oct. 28 (Evening), Saturday, Oct. 29 (Matinee); Saturday Oct. 29 (Evening)

Team: Last week it was Dania Beach chasing Fort Lauderdale. This week it was Hollywood. It didn't start that way. On Friday night, FL shot out of the blocks with 3 wins and 7 "in the money" finishes in the first five games, increasing their 26 point lead to 43. Dania Beach had a rocky night with only 20 points, but Hollywood quietly stayed with FL (for the night if still far behind for the tournament). Hollywood had a tremendous Matinee on Saturday with 43 points, picking up 19 points on DB and 20 on Fort Lauderdale. The teams played to a standoff on Saturday Evening (separated by 7 points for the performance). When it was all over FL had actually added 13 points to its overall lead (26 to 39) but Hollywood was the real winner, getting back into the competition. While still in 3rd place (they climbed into 2nd during the early games Saturday Evening but then fell back), they cut their deficit from 61 to 48. And they are now 9 points out of 2nd place, after being 35 points in arrears after last week's play. Hollywood's early gamers played a crucial role, with 7 wins and 14 ITMs for the 3 performances.

Individual: Aimar (H-f) led all scorers with 28 points. He was part of a trio of Hollywood front courters who scored over 20 points this week (Arbe--23, and Diego-c--22 were the others). Diego now has 79 points for the competition.   Between them they accounted for 11 wins and 20 ITMs for the three performances. Leading back courter for the week  was Urturan-H with 24 points. Ibon-H and Urbieta-FL had 20. Erik (FL-c) scored 18 points, his first time under 20 in this competition. His 118 points leads second place Aimar by 35 points. Leke (DB), despite a slow week, still leads all back courters with 73 points, 6 more than Urbieta. Zulaika (DB-c) also had a slow week, with only 10 points, to give him 42 for the competition.

Summary Week 5: November 4-5. 3 performances. Friday, Nov. 4 (Evening), Saturday, Nov. 5 (Matinee); Saturday Nov. 5 (Evening)

Team: Hollywood passed Dania Beach like a race car going past a 53 foot semi-trailer truck, turning their 9 point deficit into a 39 point lead. They are now looking to pass Fort Lauderdale for the overall lead. Two weeks ago, Hollywood languished in last place, 61 points off the lead. At the end of play on Oct. 5 (which was the end of the 5th week and the half-way point in the tournament), they trailed FL by 19 points. DB is in third after a poor week in which they scored only 67 points, the lowest weekly output of the tournament so far. Hollywood had the best week of anyone so far, with 115 points. Their depth in both front court and back (3 players with more than 70 points in each) meant that they prospered in spite of a poor week by their captain (see below, under individual). FL is heavily dependent on their captain (also see below) and it looks like he will need more help if they are to hold on to their lead. Hollywood blew the competition apart in the first performance on Friday night, with 53 points (the most for any performance so far), outscoring FL by 31 and DB by 38. FL made a comeback in the Saturday Matinee, lead by their captain's 4 victories in 4 starts in the last 5 games, but Hollywood made up most of what they lost with a solid Saturday Evening performance. DB has now had 2 poor weeks in a row. Hollywood had 39 ITMs in the 30 games. FL had 30 and DB had 21.

Individual: Aimar (H-f) led all scorers for the second week in a row with 35 points. Erik (FL-f-c) was second with 32. Larrea (H-b) led back court scorers with 25 points. He doubled his season total.  Chasio (H-b) was second with 24. At the halfway point in the tournament, Erik leads all scorers with 150 points. Aimar is 2nd with 118. Leke (DB-b) leads all back courters with 88 points. Urbieta (FL-b) and Salegi (H-b) are 2nd with 76. Hollywood is starting to show great depth, with 3 front courters (Aimar, Diego-c (83) and Arrieta (71)) and 3 back courters (Salegi (76), Urturan (75) and Chasio (70)) with 70 or more points. In Deigo's case, he is 4th in overall scoring in spite of book end 1st and 5th weeks that yielded a total of 12 points. As for DB, they are still waiting for Zulaika's (f-c) (56pts) engine to turn over.

Summary Week 6: November 11-12. 3 performances. Friday, Nov. 11 (Evening), Saturday, Nov. 12 (Matinee); Saturday Nov. 12 (Evening)

Team: Last week Hollywood passed Dania Beach to move into second place. This week in the 4th game on Friday Evening, they passed Fort Lauderdale to move into first place. They kept right on going, establishing a 29 point lead by the end of play Saturday Evening. After Week 3 they were buried in last place, 61 points behind FL. 3 consecutive 100 point weeks, including the two highest scoring weeks of the tournament in the last two weeks, have catapulted them into the lead. Last week they were led by their early gamers (G1-5), outscoring FL 29-3 and 30-4 in the first two performances. Fort Lauderdale had a disastrous 66 point weekend, the lowest output of any team for the tournament so far. Their imbalance in the front court is becoming a glaring weakness, their captain scoring almost 100 points more than any of their other front men. Dania Beach finally got some scoring out of their captain and received an excellent week from one of their other front men (see below), but a promising weekend (70 points in the two evening performances) was sabotaged by an 18 point total in the Saturday Matinee, leaving them 67 points behind the new leaders.

Individual: The silver lining in Dania Beach's cloud was Ithurria (f), who had 35 points in the three performances. Salegi (H-b) was 2nd with 27, and Arbe (H-f) 3rd with 26. At the end of 6 weeks, Eric (FL-f-c) leads all scorers with 175 points. Aimar (H-f) is 2nd with 141. Salegi (H) took over the back court lead with 103 points, 2 ahead of Leke (DB). Diego (H-f-c) had another ordinary week, but his 3 excellent weeks still have him as second leading front courter on his team in spite of his 3 slow ones. Zulaika (DB-f-c) had his first 20 point weekend of the campaign. His team will need much more of the same to fight its way back into contention.

Summary Week 7: November 18-19. 3 performances: Friday Nov. 18 (Evening), Saturday, Nov. 19 (Matinee), Saturday Nov. 19 (Evening)

Team: Hollywood increased its lead from 29 to 53 points over Fort Lauderdale. Their 4th consecutive 100 point weekend  (double the number of 100 point weekends of the two other teams combined) led the way. Hollywood had 15 wins over the weekend (12 in the 2 Saturday performances), Fort Lauderdale 8, and Dania Beach 7. What was telling was how Hollywood's late gamers stretched the lead in the last 5 games of the Saturday Evening performance. They scored 27 points (4 wins, 2 places, 1 show) to Fort Lauderdale's 7 and Dania Beach's 11. Fort Lauderdale had sliced their deficit from 29 to 16 on the back of a 36 point performance on Friday Evening, but lost 7 points in the Matinee on Saturday. They were then devastated by a 16 point performance Saturday Evening when Hollywood had their best performance of the weekend with 46. Dania Beach fell from 67 to 94 points behind.

Individual: Arrieta (H-f) led all front courters with 26 points. He led Hollywood's charge late Saturday night with 4 wins and a show. Foronda (FL-f) had 25. In the backcourt the man who is becoming the surprise of the tournament, Salegi (H) led all scorers with 30 points. His teammate Chasio had 24. For the tournament the leading front courters are Erik (FL-c) with 195, and Aimar (H)  with 150. Salegi (H) leads all back courters with 133. Leke (DB), who has had 3 slow weeks in his last 4, is still second with 112. Hollywood has 5 100 point scorers (Arrieta (f) 116, Diego (f-c) 114, and Chasio (b)108 in addition to the ones listed above). No other team has more than 3.  Zulaika (DB-f-c) is the only captain with less than 100 points. His second good week in a row brought him to 95.

Summary Week 8: November 25-26, 3 performances: Friday Nov. 25 (Evening), Saturday Nov. 26 (Matinee), Saturday Nov. 26 (Evening)

Team: When Hollywood's  front courters began the Friday Evening performance by outscoring Fort Lauderdale 29-9 and Dania Beach 29-7 in the first five games, thereby moving 73 points ahead of FL and 116 ahead of DB, it looked like the tournament might be over. However, FL fought back hard in the second half of the performance to get back 15 points of what they'd lost. They might have made up more if not for a pivotal win of a grueling 9pt G9 by Hollywood's Diego-Ibon. At the end of the night, FL had clawed back to within 58 of Hollywood. And it got better for Fort Lauderdale in the Saturday Matinee when they outscored Hollywood 45-23, scoring in every game, winning 6 of them and being in the money 13 times in the performance. They took great advantage of the performance where Hollywood had only two teams/players per game. The lead was down to 36. And on Saturday Evening Hollywood's slump continued, even though they again had three teams/players per game. They closed with only 17 points to leave the door wide open, but Fort Lauderdale couldn't take advantage. Saddled with only 2 teams/players per game, they could only make 22 points, shaving the lead to 31. Saturday Evening belonged to Dania Beach, who, led by their Captain's amazing 5 wins  (see below) scored 51 points, by far their best performance of the tournament, and the third best performance overall. It counterbalanced their 9 point performance on Friday Evening, tying their own record for worst performance of the tournament (originally set in Week 2--October 14), the performance where they only had 2 teams/players per game. Still they picked up 19 points overall, closing to within 95 of Hollywood and 64 of Fort Lauderdale. Hollywood's 2 performance slump has opened the door for FL. Can they kick it in?

Individual: This week's leading player was Zulaika (DB-f-c), who scored 39 points after being shut out in the Friday Evening performance. The 39 points (28 of which came in a 5 win effort on Saturday Evening)  were the most by any player in the tournament, exceeding Erik's (FL-f-c) 38 points in Wk 2. The leading back courter was Yeche (DB), who partnered with his Captain on Saturday evening, getting 4 wins in the performance. He had 32 points for the weekend. Diego (H-f-c) had a solid week, scoring 21points, and being in the money 7 times. Erik leads the tournament in scoring with 213 points, the first to go over 200. The leading back courter is Hollywood's Salegi, with 154 points. In an interesting development, with both Xabat and Betia out of action for DB, Elgazabal played the entire weekend in the front court.

Summary Week 9: December 2-3, 3 performances:  Friday Dec. 2 (Evening), Saturday Dec. 3 (Matin ee), Saturday Dec. 3 (Evening)

Team: For Week 9 I thought it would be interesting to try something different for a summary. Rather than go through a narrative, the idea is that numbers are worth a thousand words. This week I will simply present the actual scoring game by game. If you look below at the team standings and start from Week 8 totals, you can actually see how Hollywood's lead expanded and then contracted over the weekend. When Fort Lauderdale made their big run on Saturday Evening (see especially G3-6 when Hollywood was shut out), they cut their deficit by 19. Watch what happens in G7-10. Urtaran, Diego-Ibon, and Arrieta stopped the slump in its tracks, adding 1 point to the lead. The other thing to watch is the effect having 2 posts per game has on the outcome of the performance. For Hollywood and FL it was a tremendous effect. For Dania Beach, not so much.

Game by game scoring for the three performances. Scores are listed by team standings (Hollywood (1), Fort Lauderdale (2), Dania Beach(3)). Win=5, Place=3, Show=1

12/2(E): H=3 posts per game, 47pts. FL=2 posts, 20pts.  DB=3 posts, 23pts.

G1(5,3,1); G2(5,3,1); G3(6,0,3); G4(5,3,1); G5(3,1,5); G6(0,5,4); G7(6,0,3); G8(6,0,3); G9(3,5,1); G10(8,0,1).

12/3(M): H=3 posts per game, 37pts.  FL=3 posts, 22pts. DB=2 posts, 31 pts..

G1(3,1,5); G2(5,1,3); G3(4,0,5); G4(8,0,1); G5(0,8,1); G6(0,1,8); G7(6,3,0); G8(0,3,6); G9(8,0,1); G10(3,5,1).

12/3(E): H=2 posts per game, 23pts. FL=3 posts, 39pts. DB=3 posts, 28pts.

G1(5,0,4); G2(3,6,0); G3(0,3,6); G4(0,5,4); G5(0,6,3); G6(0,5,4); G7(5,3,1); G8(5,3,1); G9(0,5,4); G10(5,3,1).

H=107pts, FL=81pts. DB=82pts.

There was a post on Tiger's Chalk Talk Discussion Board  about the possibility of the final round of the tournament doubling the points for each game. If that is the case, then the final round would be a playoff rather than a round. I believe the teams should be handicapped by their standing going into a playoff. Since there is no such thing as a "home court" advantage, the handicap should be number of opportunities. Throughout the season, each team has 80 opportunities (posts) for each weekend. 3-3-2 is rotated through each team. But in such a playoff, it would only be fair to give Hollywood 90 opportunities (3-3-3), Fort Lauderdale 80 (3-3-2), and Dania Beach 70 (2-2-3). Otherwise the "regular season" loses all meaning, in my opinion. I don't know if the double points system will be used or not. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Update on the update: According to the entries posted for this coming week, there will be no handicapping. It will be the usual 3-3-2 rotation, with Hollywood having 2 entries in each game of the Friday Evening performance, and Fort Lauderdale having 2 in the Saturday Evening performance.

Individual: Goitia (FL) and Zulaika (DB-c) led all front courters this weekend with 25 points. For Zulaika, it was a second consecutive weekend of 25 points or more and finally put him into the lead of his own team's depleted front court scoring. Again Betia and Xabat did not play, forcing Elgazabal into the front court. The back courters were led again by Salegi (H) with 31 points. From week 6-9 he has scored over 30 points twice. He is making a very good case, in my opinion, for player of the tournament. Look at 12/2 (E) performance (above). Hollywood knew they had to capitalize on their post advantage over FL. Salegi won (by himself or with help) the first 4 games, setting the tone for the entire weekend. Leading scorer in the tournament is still Erik (FL-f-c) with 228 points, though he had (for him) a slow weekend. Leading back courter is Salegi with 185. Diego (H-f-c) had an ordinary weekend, but one of his victories was part of Hollywood's great "goal line stand" on Saturday evening (see Team summary above).

Back to the update

Dania Jai Alai 2016 Fall Season Final Standings

Dania provides its final standings sorted by the number worn by the player. It might be interesting to look at this in a couple of other ways. Below are two sorts that I did that might be more entertaining (and maybe a little more enlightening). The first is a simple win sort. The second is a win sort by player position (front or back court).

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins.

Key:

Player-G-W-P-S-W%-ITM-ITM%

Erik    455    128    87    59    0.281    274    0.602

Leke    475    83    82    67    0.175    232    0.488

Diego    471    77    70    65    0.163    212    0.45

Salegi    474    74    44    67    0.156    185    0.39

Barandika 522    70    74    63    0.134    207    0.397

====================================

Israel    379    66    54    47    0.174    167    0.441

Aimar    513    65    70    74    0.127    209    0.407

Arbe    431    63    65    47    0.146    175    0.406

Amigorena 396    61    43    40    0.154    144    0.364

Zulaika    485    61    75    61    0.126    197    0.406

==================================== 

Goitia    482    58    54    61    0.12    173    0.359

Ibon    444    55    40    61    0.124    156    0.351

Minte    460    55    56    58    0.12    169    0.367

Urbieta    384    53    52    43    0.138    148    0.385

Garita    440    53    68    60    0.12    181    0.411

==================================== 

Arrieta    494    53    56    70    0.107    179    0.362

Chasio    435    49    52    57    0.113    158    0.363

Manex    442    49    46    70    0.111    165    0.373

Foronda    343    48    50    44    0.14    142    0.414

Urtaran    438    45    58    54    0.103    157    0.358

==================================== 

Zabala    458    45    47    53    0.098    145    0.317

Ithurria    308    44    45    49    0.143    138    0.448

Jairo    437    42    44    47    0.096    133    0.304

Yeche    297    41    34    28    0.138    103    0.347

Larrea    470    39    60    66    0.083    165    0.351

==================================== 

Elizalde  365    34    39    36    0.093    109    0.299

Arta    473    34    43    49    0.072    126    0.266

Bailo    274    32    39    36    0.117    107    0.391

Xabat    366    31    37    37    0.085    105    0.287

Iturbide  232    23    23    35    0.099    81    0.349

==================================== 

Beitia    277    20    30    28    0.072    78    0.282

*Elgezabal 338    19    31    35    0.056    85    0.251

Anndy    182    10    12    13    0.055    35    0.192

==================================== 

Suso    0    0    0    0        0   

Roke    0    0    0    0        0   

Jagoba    0    0    0    0        0   

====================================
==================================== 

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins by position

Front Court

Erik    455    128    87    59    0.281    274    0.602

Diego    471    77    70    65    0.163    212    0.45

Barandika522    70    74    63    0.134    207    0.397

Aimar    513    65    70    74    0.127    209    0.407

Arbe    431    63    65    47    0.146    175    0.406

==================================== 

Zulaika    485    61    75    61    0.126    197    0.406

Goitia    482    58    54    61    0.12    173    0.359

Arrieta    494    53    56    70    0.107    179    0.362

Foronda    343    48    50    44    0.14    142    0.414

Ithurria308    44    45    49    0.143    138    0.448

==================================== 

Jairo    437    42    44    47    0.096    133    0.304

Arta    473    34    43    49    0.072    126    0.266

Xabat    366    31    37    37    0.085    105    0.287

Iturbide232    23    23    35    0.099    81    0.349

Beitia    277    20    30    28    0.072    78    0.282

====================================

Anndy    182    10    12    13    0.055    35    0.192

Back Court

Leke    475    83    82    67    0.175    232    0.488

Salegi    474    74    44    67    0.156    185    0.39

Israel    379    66    54    47    0.174    167    0.441

Amigorena396    61    43    40    0.154    144    0.364

Ibon    444    55    40    61    0.124    156    0.351

====================================

Minte    460    55    56    58    0.12    169    0.367

Urbieta    384    53    52    43    0.138    148    0.385

Garita    440    53    68    60    0.12    181    0.411

Chasio    435    49    52    57    0.113    158    0.363

Manex    442    49    46    70    0.111    165    0.373

====================================

Urtaran    438    45    58    54    0.103    157    0.358

Zabala    458    45    47    53    0.098    145    0.317

Yeche    297    41    34    28    0.138    103    0.347

Larrea    470    39    60    66    0.083    165    0.351

Elizalde365    34    39    36    0.093    109    0.299

====================================

Bailo    274    32    39    36    0.117    107    0.391

*Elgezabal338    19    31    35    0.056    85    0.251

*Elgazabal played several matches in the front court toward the end of the season. His front court production is incorporated in his statistics. There were rare occasions where other players played out of position. I have made no attempt to decipher when this happened.

Back to the update

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta--Analysis of Aritz' great week

Complete weekly statistics of wins and losses (wins defined as 1st (win), 2nd (place), or 3rd (show) in quinella score matches, losses defined as every game not "in the money") are accounted for, by week and cumulatively, under the "Jai Alai, Miami weekly leaders" page on the right side of main updates blog.

If you look at the Miami Player Pages for each Monday, you will see a precise accounting of how each player did for the week. A week's performances (the entire schedule of games in one day is called a performance in Quinella based pari-mutual Jai Alai) are quickly summarized by subtracting the figures for the beginning of the previous week from the figures from the beginning of the present week. You can do that yourself or you can check Tiger's Jai Alai Chalk Talk Discussion Forum, which has been active since 2003 and discusses all things Jai Alai (mostly in English). The discussion forum is supported by the Jai Alai Heaven website, which contains a very large and well organized collection of Jai Alai related information. The most important part of JAH from an information standpoint, is the One Stop Info page, which links to all the statistics you'll ever need regarding professional Quinella Jai Alai in the U.S. Tiger takes that info and distills it into a set of weekly data that is tremendously useful for whatever purpose you choose. That is the weekly data that he has so kindly given me permission to copy into my Miami (and soon also into another page for Dania) recurring results page.

One Stop Info, from a librarian's point of view, is about as perfectly organized a web page as you will find anywhere on any topic. In a very small amount of space, Tiger has linked to a very large array of statistics. It is completely intuitive, and for those who wish to follow this type of Jai Alai on a day to day basis, this is the essential bookmark.

I am going to spend a little time trying to explain Quinella Jai Alai in order to help you understand the magnitude of the week that Aritz Erkiaga had between August 31 to September 5, 2016. For those of you who are very familiar with the game, simply scroll down from here to where Aritz' day to day data is (Aritz Erkiaga, like all other players...).

Quinella Jai Alai is a very different discipline from the partido Jai Alai we have been following. It is set up like a horse race, because its main context and purpose is pari-mutual wagering. Each game consists of 8 (singles) or 16 (doubles) players, in other words, eight teams. Team 1 plays one point against Team 2. The winner keeps playing. The loser goes back to the bench and waits for its turn in the rotation to come up again. Games are played to 7 or 9 points. In the first round, each point is worth 1 point. In every subsequent round each point is worth 2 points. This means that a 7 point match can be won with anywhere from 4 to 7 actual points, a  9 point match with anywhere from 5 to 8. There are various types of wagers, the most popular being the trifecta (pick winner, place and show).

In this form of the sport mistakes are harshly punished. A mistake causes your team to be thrown out of the game for, I believe, the next 6 actual points. Games cannot be won from the bench. What this means to the players is that there is no time to get into a rhythm.

At Miami there are 12 games in each performance. Games 1-6 are usually played by the "B" players, games 7-12 usually by the "A" players. Games 1-6 consist of two singles matches, one 9 point match and three 7 point matches. Games 7-12 are a little different in that there are two 9 point matches instead of one. The key word about this set up is "usually." For various reasons, early game players play in late games, and vice versa. The two key variables, variables which change from game to game are "post position" (1-8) and partnerships in the doubles matches. In general, high number post positions such as 6-8 are more difficult to win from.  First because a later post position takes longer to get in the game. Second because the number of opportunities to get back into the game after losing a point diminishes as the game progresses.

The uniforms of players are color coded and have two numbers, post position on the front and personal on the back. For anyone who has never watched Quinella Jai Alai, it can be quite confusing at first. The reason for all the confusion is to make the wagering interesting and entertaining. This also makes it more difficult for players to win matches. There is no consistency of anything from match to match.

Quinella Jai Alai at Miami is very demanding. It is played 6 days a week (Tuesday's are off days). Each game is completely different. It is one of the most mentally taxing sports imaginable. Grinding out game after game, day after day, in post position after post position, with partner after partner is extremely difficult. And of course this doesn't begin to deal with the physical demands of the sport.

Aritz Erkiaga, like all other players, usually has a base workload of 5 games a performance. He plays, for the most part, in the late games. For various reasons, his workload for the 6 days we will look at was 39 games, the second highest workload for the week of anyone on the 36 player Miami roster.

Of those 39 games, Aritz (his playing name) won 16. Four players tied for second for the week with 7 wins. Aritz more than doubled the wins of his nearest competitor for the week. If you look at the figures for the week ending August 29 (a "short week" because the Fronton was closed  for two days by the threat of dangerous weather) and August 22, which is when I began the Miami page), or if you look at earlier weekly figures that are available at the discussion forum listed above, you will see what a normal spread between the leading winner and the second place winner usually is. Only then can Aritz' week be truly appreciated.

Another way to appreciate this achievement is to look at it a little more closely. I compiled each game Aritz played, day by day. This was more difficult than it might seem, because there were days when he substituted for another player. Tiger provides a list of these substitutions, making such a compilation possible. The substitution list is not guaranteed to be completely accurate, as Tiger explains, but it is the only list we have. Miami Jai Alai, inexplicably, does not provide an official list.  So with the knowledge that this might not be the exact, true picture, lets take a look at Aritz' week.

Key:

Game Number (G1,2,...); Post Number (P1, P2...); Finish (F1 (win),2 (place),3(show) or X--out of the money); type of game (7D=7 point doubles, 9D=9 point doubles, 7S=7 point singles); Partner. Aritz plays the front court.


*=Substitute

Wednesday, August 31:

G2,,,,P7....FX....7D....Santiso
G3....P2....F3.....7D....Cisneros
G4....P1....F1.....9D....Alejandro
G7....P3....F1.....7D....Arriza
G8....P7....F2.....9D....Ricky
G10..P6....F3.....9D....Ladutxe
G11..P5....FX....7D....Aldazabal
G12..P2....F2.....7S

8 games, P1, P2(2), P3, P5, P6, P7(2)
2 wins, 2 place, 2 show, 2 out of the money
Won from P1 and P3
Won with Alexandro and Arriza

Thursday, September 1, 2016

G7....P6....F1....D7....Ladutxe
G8....P5....FX...D9....Cisneros
G10..P1....F1....D9....Irastorza
G11..P2....F1....D7....Ricky
G12..P6....FX...S7

5 games, P1, P2, P5, P6(2)
3 wins, 2 out of the money
Won from P1, P2, P6
Won with Ladutxe, Irastorza, and Ricky

Friday, September 2, 2016

G4*...P8....F1....D9....Sierra II
G6*...P3....FX...D7....Spinner
G7.....P8....FX...D7....Manuel
G8.....P8....F3....D9....Ricky
G10...P3....F1....D9....Ladutxe
G11...P1....F1....D7....Duke
G12...P6....F1....S7

7 Games, P1, P3(2), P6, P8(3)
4 wins, 1 show, 2 out of the money
Won from P1, P3, P6, P8
Won with Sierra II, Ladutxe, Duke

Saturday, September 3, 2016

G7....P8....FX....D7....Ricky
G8....P7....F3.....D9....Duke
G10..P8....FX....D9....Manuel
G11..P1....F1.....D7....Cisneros
G12..P3....F1.....S7

5 games, P1, P3, P7, P8(2)
2 wins, 1 show, 2 out of the money
Won P1, P3
Won with Cisneros

Sunday, September 4, 2016

G7....P1....F1....D7....Manuel
G8....P1....F2....D9....Cisneros
G10..P8....FX...D9....Duke
G11..P4....F2....D7....Irastorza
G12..P2....F1....S7

5 games, P1(2), P2, P4, P8
2 wins, 2 place, 1 out of the money
Won from P1, P2
Won with Manuel

September 5, 2016

G2....P4....FX....D7....Aizpitarte
G3....P6....FX....D7....Ladutxe
G4....P8....F2.....D9....Arriza
G5....P1....F1.....S7
G6....P1....FX....D7.....Irastorza
G7*..P6....FX....D7.....Guisasola
G8*..P7....F3.....D9.....Garro
G10..P2....F1.....D9.....Guisasola
G11..P7....F1.....D7.....Duke

9 games, P1(2), P2, P4, P6(2), P7(2), P8
3 wins, 1 place, 1 show, 4 out of the money
Won from P1, P2,  P7
Won with Gusasola, Duke

39 games, 16 wins .(410 winning percentage), 5, place, 5 show,  26 in the money (.667 in the money percentage).

Won 4 singles out of  6
Place 1 singles out of 6
Out of the money 1 singles out of 6

Won 12 doubles out of 33
Placed 4 doubles out of 33
Show 5 doubles out of 33
Out of the money 12 doubles out of 33

Won from Post 1: 6 of 8
Won from Post 2: 3 of 5
Won from Post 3: 3 of 4
Won from Post 4: 0 of 2
Won from Post 5: 0 of 2
Won from Post 6: 2 of 6
Won from Post 7: 1 of 5
Won from Post 8: 1 of 7

Won with Alexandro, Arriza, Cisneros,  Duke (2), Guisasola, Irastorza,  Ladutxe (2), Manuel, Ricky, Sierra II

Aritz took care of business when he had good opportunities. Out of the 1-3 post positions (17 opportunities), where a high percentage (.394 through Sep. 5) of matches are won, he won 75 percent. From the 6-8 positions (18 opportunities) where a much lower percentage (.262) of matches are won, his percentage was .222. He also made the most of his opportunities when he didn't have to worry about who his partner was. He wasn't particularly effective in early games (3 wins, 4 in the money out of 10). He won with 10 different partners. Finally, in the very latest games (10-12), games where it sometimes takes a great deal of energy just to keep going (see especially Sep. 5), but also the marquee games of the day, he won 10 times in 17 tries, a .588 winning percentage. In these games he was in the money 13 times, a .765 winning percentage. He must have been very tired at the end of the Sep. 5 performance. It was quite a week.

Back to the Update

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta--Remonte--Pala-- Long court to short court trends in Jai Alai/Cesta Punta, Remonte, and Pala

It was very interesting to see Jai Alai/Cesta Punta played on a short court. The Bizkaia Fronton is a big short court at 38 meters, but it is still a short court. The powers that be on the Basque Country Jai Alai scene wish to take the game to more fans. And it is a simple matter of arithmetic. There are many more short courts than long ones. The players are good enough to adapt their game to the different conditions.

The trend is the same for two other implement modalities, Pala and Remonte. Pala has been going toward more short court matches for some time. A couple of InnPala's up and coming stars, Dan Necol and Sylvain Brefel are from the North Basque and learned their games on short courts. Remonte also plays several summer tournaments on short courts, again in an effort to spread the game. 

Before there were indoor courts there were outdoor courts (Fronton Place Libres). These have only one wall. They are much bigger than long courts, between 80 and 100 meters long. The long courts are around 54 meters long and the short courts around 36.

 I thought it might be interesting to show the evolution from long to short courts with video examples for these three sports. Each of them has a "cathedral" long court (Mungia for Pala, Hernani for Remonte, and Gernika for Jai Alai).There are matches from all three below. Things to look for in these examples are the differences in speed, implements (espcially for Pala, where the Grosse/Larga bat can weigh up to 950 grams, far heavier than the corta/motza bats used on short courts), and the subtle changes in strategies that the sizes of the courts encourage. The outdoor games seem to be the most conservative, the players are not really looking for kill shots. These games emphasize power to send deep shots over and over trying to induce mistakes. As the courts get smaller the ability to kill points quickly becomes more a part of the strategy.

Note: with the exception of the Grand Chistera video (a video of the first 23 minutes, 14 seconds of the match) all of the below linked videos are full match videos.

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta

Outdoors (Grand Chistera)

May 15, 2015: Section Paloise Pelote Fronton (Pau)

Chapionnat de France 2015 poule match

White (J.Olharan-L.Alliez-S.Itoiz) defeated Green (C.Pierrou-A.Alliez-
J.Portet)  40-34.

Match video (Source: Toute sur la Pelote Basque Youtube site)

Long Court

August 5, 2016: Fronton Gernika Jai Alai (1) (2)

Gernika II Jai Alai World Tour Final

3rd place:

Barandika-Amigorena defeated Erik-Lekerika 2-1

Final:

Hormaetxea-Aldazabal defeated Beaskoetxea-Txasio 2-1

Match Video (Source: EITB)

Short Court

August 28, 2016: Bizkaia Fronton (Bilbo (Bilbao)).

Jai Alai World Tour CPO Individual MPB Semi-Final

Olharan defeated Hormaextea 2-1

Match video (Source: EITB)

=================================

Pala:

Outdoors (Grosse Pala)

August 9, 2016: Soustons Fronton Municipal (1) (2)

2016 Championnat de France National A Final

Soustons (Jérome Bats-Fabien Brocas) defeated Esquiule (Michel Bassignana- Hervé Belestin) 40-20

Match video (Source: PilotariP Youtube site)

Pala Larga Indoor

April 16, 2016: Mundo Parejas Final: Udala (City) Fronton (Mungia)

Final:

Fusto-Brefel defeated Gaubeka-Imanol 3-2

3rd place:

Necol--Ibai Perez defeated Landeta-Ibargari 3-2

Match video (Source: EITB)

Short Court (Pala Corta/Pala Motza) 

August 17, 2016: Atano III Fronton, Donastia (San Sebastian) 

Kirol Txartela Masters Tournament 

3rd place:

Landeta--Ibai-Perez defeated Arozena-Irrigoyen 3-1

Final:

Navarro-Brefel defeated Zubiri-Ayerbe 3-2

Match video (Source: EITB)

=================================

Remonte: I have never seen an outdoor Remonte match

Long Court

December 12, 2015: Galarrata Fronton  (Hernani)

Tourneo Parejas ORONA (Binakako Txapelketa) Semifinal 

Ezkurra-Endika  defeated Urriza-Agirrezabala 40-35

Match video (Source: EITB)

Short Court

June 11, 2016: Beloki Fronton (1) (2)  (Zumarraga)

Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundiaren 2016ko Saria-VII Erremonte Kopa.

Final

Uterga-Aizpuru III defeated Urriza-Zaldua 35-25

Match video This match follows a mano match: it begins at 1:06:32 on the recording (Source: EITB)

Back to the update