Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Dania Jai Alai 2017 Winter Season Final Standings Sorted by Wins and Wins by Position

Dania provides its final standings sorted by the number worn by the player. It might be interesting to look at this in a couple of other ways. Below are two sorts that I did that might be more entertaining (and maybe a little more enlightening). The first is a simple win sort. The second is a win sort by player position (front or back court).

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins.

Key:

Player Number-Player-Games-Wins-Places-Shows-Winning%-In the Money%-Position (F=Forward, B=Back).

Note: players tied for number of wins are sorted by winning percentage.

11 Erik       521 134 83 62 .257 .536 F

59 Leke      585 109 73 79 .186 .446 B
20 Iturbide  582 96 64 72 .165 .399  F
38 Urbieta   566 95 84 63 .168 .428  B
46 Arrieta    552 78 64 66 .141 .377  F

27 Aimar     517 77 60 72 .149 .404  F
28 Arbe       560 75 74 72 .134 .395  F
67 Bailo      567 74 84 69 .131 .400  B
22 Diego     499 72 62 54 .144 .377  F
31 Jairo       538 68 55 60 .126 .340  F

49 Amigorena  558 67 59 77 .120 .364  B
18 Chasio         520 62 65 66 .119 .371  B
54 Zulaika        480 60 70 68 .125 .413  F
25 Foronda       410 57 51 56 .139 .400  F
56 Zabala         523 57 60 74 .109 .365  B

42 Barandika  566 56 81 78 .099 .380  F
69 Goitia        380 55 44 50 .145 .392  F
62 Garita        413 55 65 52 .133 .416  B
47 Xabat         549 55 77 65 .100 .359  F
98 Elgezabal   556 54 73 70 .097 .354  B

30 Larrea     527 53 56 60 .101 .321  B
39 Israel       342 51 37 40 .149 .374  B
60 Salegi      460 51 60 58 .111 .367  B
15 Ibon         549 48 61 67 .087 .321  B
19 Minte       494 43 53 60 .087 .316  B

89 Urtaran    537 41 53 80 .076 .324  B
23 Ithurria     279 38 37 29 .136 .373  F
29 Manex      306 37 48 38 .121 .402  B
50 Elizalde    444 30 54 45 .068 .291  B
14 Arta          429 26 38 62 .061 .294  F

12 Beitia     301 24 41 40 .080 .349  F
26 Jagoba    250 22 34 16 .088 .288  F

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins by position.

Front Court

11 Erik       521 134 83 62 .257 .536 F

20 Iturbide  582 96 64 72 .165 .399  F
46 Arrieta    552 78 64 66 .141 .377  F
27 Aimar     517 77 60 72 .149 .404  F
28 Arbe       560 75 74 72 .134 .395  F

22 Diego        499 72 62 54 .144 .377  F
31 Jairo          538 68 55 60 .126 .340  F
54 Zulaika      480 60 70 68 .125 .413  F
25 Foronda     410 57 51 56 .139 .400  F
42 Barandika  566 56 81 78 .099 .380  F

69 Goitia     380 55 44 50 .145 .392  F
47 Xabat      549 55 77 65 .100 .359  F
23 Ithurria    279 38 37 29 .136 .373  F
14 Arta        429 26 38 62 .061 .294  F
12 Beitia      301 24 41 40 .080 .349  F

26 Jagoba     250 22 34 16 .088 .288  F

Back Court

59 Leke          585 109 73 79 .186 .446 B

38 Urbieta       566 95 84 63 .168 .428  B
67 Bailo           567 74 84 69 .131 .400  B
49 Amigorena   558 67 59 77 .120 .364  B
18 Chasio         520 62 65 66 .119 .371  B

56 Zabala       523 57 60 74 .109 .365  B
62 Garita        413 55 65 52 .133 .416  B
98 Elgezabal  556 54 73 70 .097 .354  B
30 Larrea       527 53 56 60 .101 .321  B
39 Israel         342 51 37 40 .149 .374  B

60 Salegi        460 51 60 58 .111 .367  B
15 Ibon           549 48 61 67 .087 .321  B
19 Minte         494 43 53 60 .087 .316  B
89 Urtaran       537 41 53 80 .076 .324  B
29 Manex        306 37 48 38 .121 .402  B


50 Elizalde      444 30 54 45 .068 .291  B

Back to the update

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Jai Alai/Cesta Punta--Miami Jai Alai April 9, Game 4--complete enhanced linescore

Full match video of Miami Jai Alai Game 4, April 9, 2017

I decided to try my hand at scoring a quiniela match. It was a very difficult task. Normally I would not be able to do this because live scoring is beyond my capability and Dania, which offers live matches, does not offer them free on demand. Miami matches are pay per view. Since I had a Youtube video of a complete game (a video which only lasted a little over 12 minutes), I could stop the video at any time and study points to either verify or change my judgments. But there are other problems with scoring a Quiniela match. In this video, the order of the matchups was not posted on the screen, so I had to pay careful attention to keep the matchups correct. For Miami, that is not so easy. Some uniforms are so bleached out it is hard to tell color. Some players do not have numbers or names on their backs. I used the player list shown at the beginning of the video to decipher who was who. I think I got it right, but there might be mistakes in this game "map." Enjoy, and please let me know if you find any mistakes.

Winner-error judgments are my own, based on my limited knowledge of the game, as well as  player body language. I am a "generous" scorer, as, on a close call, a winner makes two players happy, and an error makes two players angry. My basic rule is like that used in baseball scoring of hits or errors. Could the play be reasonably expected to be made by a professional player?

Key: Team # Serving-(Team points); Team # Receiving (Team points); Number of balls in play; (Team # that won the point); Player +=winner +a=service ace - = error; selected comments, time of the point on the video. Note that in the first round 1 point is awarded. All subsequent rounds award 2. Game 4 is played to 9 points.

* Possible Game Point

Teams: 1 Sierra-Sierra II  2. Tevin-Ubilla  3. Jon-Garro  4. Jabe-Ladutxeb5. Berikua-Aldazabal 6. Aizarna-Santiso57. Zinkunegi-Arriza sl8. Aritz-Spinnersl
First
First Round

1(0)-2(0); 12(2); Tevin +; 6:02--7:34
2(1)-3(0); 14(3); Garro +; 1:40--2:34
3(1)-4(0); 3(3); Jon +; 2:46--3:01
3(2)-5(0); 1(3); Jon +a; 3:05--3:13
3(3)-6(0); 4(6); Aizarna +; (dejada); 3:19--3:37
6(1)-7(0); 25(6); Santiso +; 3:50--5:36
6(2)-8(0); 4(8); Aritz +; (cortada past Aizarna); 5:39--5:55

Second Round

8(1)-1(0); 21(8) Aritz +;  (chic chac or chula); 6:02--7:34
8(3)-2(1); 2(2); Aritz -;  (a simple dropped catch); 7:36--7:42
2(3)-4(0); 7(2); Jabi -; 7:49--8:23
2(5)-5(0); 3(2); Tevin +; (two wall); 8:34--8:47
2(7)*-3(3); 2(3); Jon +; (two wall); 8:50-8:56
3(5)-7(0); 6(7); Jon -; 9:07--9:35
7(2)-6(2); 4(6); Aizarna +; (nice shot to the outside); 9:35--9:57

Third Round

6(4)-1(0); 6(1); Sierra II +; 9:58--10:26
1(2)-8(3); 2(8); Spinner +; 10:35--10:45
8(5)-4(0); 14(4); Jabe +; 10:48--11:48
4(2)-5(0); 1(4); Jabe +a; 11:56--12:02
4(4)-2(7)*; 4(2) Ubilla +; 12:08--12:29

2: Tevin-Ubilla win

3(5)-8(5); 6(8); Aritz +; 12:40--13:07

8: Aritz-Spinner Place
3: Jon-Garro Show

6(4)-4(4); 6(4) Jabi +; 13:14--14:13

4: Jabi-Ladutxe finish 4th

2-8-3-4

Miami Jai Alai Results for April 9, 2017

Balls in play: 147

Teams "in the money" (to 4th place) actual point scores

2. Tevin-Ubilla 5-2
8. Aritz-Spinner 4-2
3. Aizarna-Santiso 4-3
4. Jon-Garro 2-3

21 points contested

Individual scoring:

Aritz +3 -1
Jabe +3 -1
Jon +3 -1
Aizarna +2
Tevin +2
Garro +1
Santiso +1
Sierra II +1
Spinner +1
Ubilla +1

Add up all the numbers (+ and -) as they all led to points. They add to 21.

Back to the update

j  Jon-Garrow3. Jo

Monday, February 20, 2017

Luzean (Saint Jean de Luz) v Section Paloise (Pau): enhanced point by point linescore

Luzean (Saint Jean de Luz) (Ramuntcho Amestoy-Stéphane Suzanne--red).defeated Section Paloise (Pau) (Olivier Laberdesque-Baptiste Hourçourigaray--white) 40-37.

Match article  (for this match and the other three finals)(Source: FFPB)

Condensed linescore (winners always listed first)

1-0; 1-3; 2-3; 2-5; 3-5; 3-11; 5-11; 5-12; 8-12; 8-13; 12-13; 12-15; 13-15; 13-16; 15-16; 15-23; 16-23; 16-27; 17-27; 17-28; 21-28; 21-29; 26-29; 26-31; 29-31; 29-32; 30-32; 30-33; 31-33; 31-34; 35-34; 35-35;  36-35; 36-37; 40-37

Equalities:

1-1; 34-34; 35-35; 36-36; 37-37

Decades:

3-7; 8-12; 14-16; 16-24; 21-29; 29-31; 35-35

Lead changes: 4 (3 after 34-34)

Scoring. Note the scoring is based on my subjective judgment. You may see it differently. Let this be a point of departure. Rules I follow: 1. Any serve that is not returned is credited as a service ace. 2. Errors are charged on the basis of whether a reasonable effort would have kept the point going. Errors of aggression are treated the same as errors of execution.  I rely heavily on crowd reaction and player body language, as well as the above rules. In the case of a close call, my bias is for winners rather than errors. On close calls, winners make two players happy. Errors make two players angry.

Amestoy +19  (including 3 service aces) -5; Suzanne +12 -3
Laberdesque +22 (including 2 service aces) -6; Hourçourigaray +7 -3

Balls in play: 1107

Number of balls in play/Number of points

0-9/29
10-19/30
20-29/9
30-39/5
40-49/1
50-59/2
61/1

Source for all match video: Toute sur la Pelote Basque Facebook and/or Youtube site via pelotelive.free.fr If you watch the video via PFF, make sure to "desactiver" PFF's auto refresh function or the video will stop.

Full match video and selected match video.

This was a classic youth-power v experience-finesse match. A-S have played in the last 5 consecutive CDF National A finals in this modality (Source: FFPB competitions-resultats and pelotelive.free.fr), This was their 4th win in that span. They were on the back foot for much of the match, after leading 1-0. They trailed 3-11 early on in the match. Their largest deficit was 16-27 and 17-28. Laberdesque dominated the match early. But A-S never panicked, never screamed in frustration or tossed a paleta. They played with cool intellect and very slowly worked their way back into the match. Both players seemed always to be in the right spot at the right time. Their shot making ability (Amestoy's deadly accuracy in front and Suzanne's long range right wall shots) and great Suzanne defense began to take their toll. After their long uphill battle to equality and then a 36-35 lead, they again fell behind 36-37. What followed was classic clutch play. Beautiful winners by Suzanne, Amestoy, Suzanne, and Amestoy closed out yet another CDF for S-A. L-H played extremely well also. Only in the 7th decade, by my scoring, did they slightly crack under the pressure, with 3 errors. In the end it was the experience, intelligence, calmness under pressure, and execution of the champions that made the difference.

==========================================

Enhanced linescore--the match, point by point, to the best of my ability

Key: (A=Amestoy, S=Suzanne, L=Laberdesque, H=Hourçourigaray
Server, Number of balls in play; Score; Team in the lead (L=Saint Jean de Luz, P=Pau)--match winner always listed 1st; Player + = winner); Player +a = service ace; Player - = error

All times given are approximate on the Facebook video, as it is impossible to ascertain exact time segments on Facebook videos.

A-S win the toss and serve

Decade 1 (0:00-12:15)

A---19-----1-0(L)-----S+
A---6-------1-1(=)-----L+
L---3-------1-2(P)------L+
L---5-------1-3(P)------S-
L---6-------2-3(P)------H-
A---22-----2-4(P)------L+
L---41------2-5(P)-----A-
L---12------3-5(P)------S+
A---2-------3-6(P)------H+
L---3--------3-7(P)------L+

Decade 2 (12:30-23:00)

L---3--------3-8(P)------H+
L---15-------3-9(P)------L+
L---39-------3-10(P)----S-
L---15-------3-11(P)-----H+
L---36-------4-11(P)-----H-
A---9--------5-11(P)-----A+
A---14-------5-12(P)-----L+
L---28-------6-12(P)-----A+
A---3---------7-12(P)----A+
A---11--------8-12(P)----A+

Decade 3 (23:20-29:45)

A---16--------8-13(P)-----L+
L---26---------9-13(P)----A+
A---1---------10-13(P)----A+a
A---1---------11-13(P)----A+a
A---19--------12-13(P)----A+
A---14--------12-14(P)----L+
L---11---------12-15(P)----L+
L---10---------13-15(P)----S+
A---4----------13-16(P)----L+
L---12---------14-16(P)----S+

Decade 4 (30:20-38:50)

A---9----------15-16(P)----S+
A---20---------15-17(P)----H+
L---17----------15-18(P)----L+
L---15----------15-19(P)----H+
L---1------------15-20(P)----L+a
L---61-----------15-21(P)----L+
L---15-----------15-22(P)----L+
L---3-------------15-23(P)----A-
L---2-------------16-23(P)----A+
A---10-----------16-24(P)----L+

Decade 5 (39:00-48:10)

L---5-------------16-25(P)----S-
L---1-------------16-26(P)-----L+a
L---9-------------16-27(P)-----A-
L---22------------17-27(P)-----L-
A---16------------17-28(P)-----L+
L---4--------------18-28(P)-----A+
A---51-------------19-28(P)----L-
A---3---------------20-28(P)----A+
A---31--------------21-28(P)----A+
A---16--------------21-29(P)----H+

Decade 6 (50:05--57:45)

L---10---------------22-29(P)----S+
A---7----------------23-29(P)----L-
A---3----------------24-29(P)----A+
A---33---------------25-29(P)----S+
A---9-----------------26-29(P)----S+
A---8-----------------26-30(P)----L+
L---11----------------26-31(P)----L+
L---32----------------27-31(P)----A+
A---11----------------28-31(P)----S+
A---5-----------------29-31(P)----H-

Decade 7 (58:20--1:08:50)

A---10----------------29-32(P)----L+
L---4------------------30-32(P)----L-
A---26----------------30-33(P)----L+
L---12----------------31-33(P)----L-
A---18----------------31-34(P)----A-
L---26----------------32-34(P)----L-
A---9-----------------33-34(P)----A+
A---1-----------------34-34(=)----A+a
A---9-----------------35-34(L)----S+
A---52---------------35-35(=)----A-

Decade 8 (1:09:10-1:16:20)

L---20----------------36-35(L)----A+
A---12----------------36-36(=)----H+
L---11-----------------36-37(P)----L+
L---10-----------------37-37(=)----S+
A---17-----------------38-37(L)----A+
A---19-----------------39-37(L)----S+
A---25-----------------40-37(L)----A+

Back to the update

Friday, January 20, 2017

Pasaka--LPPB (Ligue Pelote Pays Basque) Premier Series Quarter-final.--Details of the match

This match was 1 of 4 quarter-final matches in the LPPB Premier Pasaka Competition, which began on November 13, 2016 and will end with a final on February 5, 2017. It was played on January 15, 2017.

Urrugne (1)(2) : Urrugne (Urrunarrak) (Ourquia-Ussaralde -- white) defeated Saint Pierre d'Irube (Hiriburuko Ainhara 2) (Lapergue-Latxague -- red) 13-9

Full match video (Urrunarrak Youtube)

Selections from the match are available at the bottom of this page.

I think the best way to learn a modality is to watch a match closely, and score it point by point. In amateur matches the video can be of excellent quality, but certain things that you would expect watching a sporting event may be missing. An excellent example is a scoreboard. Scoreboards, either photographed at the venue or used as a video aid, are the basic context of every sporting event. In amateur Basque Pelota matches, very often there is no scoreboard. But one of the traditions of BP is the calling out of the score. In some cases the singing out of part of it. In this match, the score is called out very clearly, point by point, in both Basque and French. However, another of the landmarks that help anyone follow a ball and court sport, the serve (who has it and when), and the order of the score, are something that fans simply take for granted as context aids.Without these landmarks as context aids, it is much more difficult to decipher what is going on. I was able to figure out Pasaka scoring by watching the match carefully. But it took a while.

Pasaka is a "direct" BP sport, that is to say, there is no front wall. Players or teams face each other across a net. In most "direct" sports one side serves until the game is over.

In Pasaka there is no serve to start a point. All points are started from one side of the court. The team that starts the point starts it by having one of its players (I have never seen a singles Pasaka match) toss the ball underhand so that it lands on roof of the side Trinquet dugout. The returner returns on the bounce or fly and the point is contested until one team fails to keep the point going. In Pasaka the teams switch sides in the middle of games. The way this worked for this match was that any time a team got to within a point of winning the game (4 points but you must win by 2, exactly as tennis is scored), the teams switch sides and the other team "serves." There is no "deuce" or "advantage." If a team is down 40-30 and scores to equalize, the score changes back to 30-30 (much like the Valentian Pelota sports of Raspall and Escalia e Corda). For long games, like the 20th game of this match, each time "deuce" became "advantage", the teams switched sides. This can become very confusing very quickly and has a tendency to lead to scoring errors, which is why I'm not going to give you complete point by point scoring.

Pasaka matches are basically played to 13 games. This was a very competitive match. Watch and enjoy.

Basic statistics.

Linescore

Key: Game score (winners of the match always listed first); Points of the game score; number of balls in play for the game. I am pretty certain about the first two, not quite as certain about the BIP numbers. But I print them to give you some idea of  how long and difficult the games were as the match progressed.

The Urrunarrak team never trailed in this match.

1-0 (4-1--26); 2-0 (6-4--54); 2-1 (1-4--14); 3-1 (4-1--35); 4-1 (4-1--35); 4-2 (2-4--24); 5-2 (4-1--21); 6-2 (4-1--22); 6-3 (0-4--27); 6-4 (1-4--23); 7-4 (4-2--32); 7-5 (1-4--27); 7-6 (2-4--54); 8-6 (4-2--39); 9-6 (4-1--38); 10-6 (4-2--49); 11-6 (4-1--28); 11-7 (2-4--31); 11-8 (0-4--27); 11-9 (8-10--92); 12-9 (4-2--27) 13-9 (4-2--22)  Total points score: Urrunarrak 71, SPI 63. For the match: 747 balls in play.

Balls in Play/Games
0-19--1
20-29--11
30-39--6
40-49--1
50-59--2
92--1

Scoring: Note that scoring is completely subjective. My cardinal rule is that a close scoring call will always be a winner (+) rather than an error (-). Calling a close one a winner makes two players happy. Calling it an error makes 2 players angry. I have never played Pasaka. I use my own judgement plus players' body language to help me. One team's winners plus their opponents' errors will always add to that team's final score. In this case the scores were 1 off the final total point score because in Game 18 the judge gave a point to the wrong team. It was a clear mistake that both teams recognized and questioned. It also got the team that was awarded the point to within one point of winning the game, which precipitated a side switch. The mistake stood. I gave no point for the mistake. It looked to me like the team that benefited from the mistake deliberately lost the next point. Such are the vagaries of amateur competitions. You can judge for yourself below.

Note that I am assuming player positions are given back court player first (the only BP modality that lists them in this order) based on the player positions given for the only other Pasaka match I've seen, which is linked to in the main article. My apologies to all players if that is incorrect.

Urrunarrak: Ourquia (back court) +28 -8; Ussaralde (front court and "server") +33 (of which 25 were volleyball style blocks, one of the signature plays in this sport) -2 (71)

Saint Pierre d'Irube: Lapergue (bc) +29 -9; Latxague (fcs) +23 (11b) -1 (62)

In this match, Urrunarrak jumped off to a lead that got as big as 6-2 before SPI began their first comeback. Both times they got close (7-6 and 11-9), Urrunarrak pulled away. There were perhaps 2 turning points in this match. The first came in Game 2 when SPI couldn't hold a 40-15 lead. Urrunarrak won 5 of the next 6 points to turn a likely 1-1 match score into 2-0. That game was pulled back by a great block shot by Ussaralde, a large man who doesn't look like an athlete but is an excellent one, in the manner of Mickey Lolich or Bartolo Colon in American baseball. When Ussaralde blocks, he blocks hard. At times I expected the ball to disintegrate. It didn't but such power surely impressed his opponents. For the game he had 5 winners, 4 of which were blocks. It set a tone for the match. The second turning point came after the mammoth 20th game, finally won 10-8  by SPI (their 3rd straight game), cutting their match deficit to 11-9. Another team might have wilted. SPI went ahead in Game 21 15-0. Then came Ussaralde. He made the block of the match to tie the score and then two more to win the game. Two more blocks in Game 22 sent his team into the semi-finals of this competition.

Just for fun, and to illustrate how difficult a point by point accounting for this sport is, here is Game 20, to the best of my ability.

Key: Server (U or SPI); Number of balls in play ("serves" are counted); score (Team ahead); Player: O=Ourquia; U=Ussaralde; Lap=Lapergue; Lat=Latxague +=winner, -=error, +b=winner via block

SPI......4..........0-15(U).........U+b
SPI......7..........15-15(=)........Lap+
SPI.....13.........30-15(S)........Lap+
SPI......1..........40-15(S)........O-
U.........3..........40-30(S).......U+b
U.........3..........30-30(=)........O+
U.........4..........30-40(S)....... O-
SPI......4..........30-30(=)........U+b
SPI......3..........40-30(S)........Lap+
U.........1..........30-30(=)........Lap-
U.........3..........40-30(U).......Lap-
SPI......3..........30-30(=)........Lap+
SPI......5..........40-30(S)..........O-
U........17.........30-30(=)..........O+
U.........3..........40-30(U)........Lat-
SPI......9..........30-30(=).........Lap+
SPI......3..........40-30(S).........Lap+
U.........6...........Jokua(S)........Lap+....SPI wins the game

 92 balls in play. SPI won on their 6th game point. U had 2 game points they failed to convert on. Lapergue scored almost 1/4 of his match points in this game. Ussaralde blocks saved the game twice, foreshadowing what was to come.

Selected video.

Game 2 (Note: you will hear the word "artua", which, according to Google Translate means "taken". In Pasaka you cannot hold the ball or try to catch it. The ball must be struck cleanly by the cesta. In this context, "artua" most likely means juggled or held). (2:55--7:55 on the video if the Youtube selection doesn't work on your device).

Game 18 (Judge gives point to incorrect team and following point, where the team that got the benefit purposefully gave the point back) (49:55--51:12)

Game 20 (53:45--63:45)

Game 21--first two points (63:48--64:23)

Games 21 and 22 (63:48--69:00)

Back to the update

Monday, January 9, 2017

Remonte--Enhanced linescore E IV-EIII v S-I

January 7, 2017. Match 3.

Etxeberria IV-Etxeberria III defeated Segurola-Ion 40-26

Full match video (EITB) (match begins at 1 hour, 13 minutes on the video)

Key: Server (E=Etxeberria III, I=Ion); number of balls in play; score (E IV-E III led from beginning to end); player E IV=Etxeberria IV, E III=Etxeberria III, S=Segurola, I=Ion; +=Winner, - =Error, +a=Service ace, 2w=2 wall winner. Note Player listed first on the team is the front court player. Back court players always serve in doubles Remonte.

Note: all scoring is my own judgement. EITB provided no visual scoring in this match. My bias is for winners Calling a close one a winner makes two players happy. Calling a close one an error makes two players angry. I use my experience, such as it is, along with player body language to help me. All points that end with the serve are considered service aces, whether or not I think the receiver should have been able to return it.

E IV--E III won the coin toss and served.

E....7.....1-0........E IV+2w
E....3.....2-0........E III+2w
E....3.....3-0........E IV+2w
E....2.....3-1........S+
I.....6.....4-1........E IV+
E....6.....4-2.........I+
I.....6.....5-2.........E IV+
E..17.....6-2.........E IV+
E....6.....6-3..........I+
I.....4.....7-3..........S-

E.....3.....8-3.........E IV+2w
E....11....9-3.........E III+
E......1...10-3........E III+a
E......7...11-3........E IV+
E......2...11-4.........S+
I.......2...12-4.........S-
E......4...12-5.........S+
I.......9...12-6.........S+2w
I.......2...13-6.........S-
E......7...14-6.........E IV+

E......9...15-6.........E IV+
E......5...16-6.........E IV+
E......3...17-6.........E IV+
E......1...18-6.........E III+a
E......1....19-6........E III+a
E.....18...19-7........S+
I......12...20-7.........E IV+2w
E......3....21-7.........E III+2w
E......2....21-8.........S+
I.......2....22-8.........E III+

E.....4.....22-9.........S+2w
I......6.....23-9.........E IV+
E.....3.....24-9........,S-
E....10....24-10.......E IV-
I.......7....24-11.......S+
I.....13....24-12.......S+
I (pasa)
I.....1......24-13........I+a
I.....3......24-14........I+
I.....4......25-14........E IV+2w
E....2......25-15........I+2w

I.....2......26-15........E IV+
E....9......27-15........E IV+
E...13.....28-15........E IV+
E.....2.....28-16........I+2w
I......8.....29-16........S-
E....5......30-16........E IV+
E....8......30-17........S+2w
I.....2.......31-17.......I-
E....9.......32-17.......E IV+2w
E....4.......32-18.......S+2w

I.....2.......33-18.......E IV+
E....2.......33-19.......S+
I.....5.......33-20.......S+
I.....1.......33-21.......I+a
I.....2.......34-21.......S-
E....8.......34-22.......I+ (1:52:23--1:53:04 on the video. E III behind the back rebote).

I.....7.......34-23.......I+2w
I.....6.......35-23.......E IV+ (E IV ends up in back court during point and wins point from there)

E....5.......36-23.......E IV+2w
E....4.......36-24........I+

I.....1.......36-25.........I+a
I.....6.......37-25.........E IV+2w
E....9.......38-25.........E IV+ (1:57:17-1:57:45 on the video. Another E III behind the back rebote).

E....3........39-25........E IV+2w
E....2........39-26........S+2w
E....3........40-26........E IV+2w

40-26

Number of balls in play: 346

Balls in play/points
0-4=35
5-9=24
10-14=5
15-19=2

Longest point: 18 (19-6 to 19-7)

Scoring:

Etxeberria IV +26 (11 10 2w) -1; Etxeberria III +7 (including 3 service aces, 2 2w) -0 (error corrected January 16, 2017)
Segurola +14 (4 2w) -6; Ion +11 (including 3 service aces, 3 2w) -1

Back to the update

Sunday, January 1, 2017

Miami Fall 2016 final standings: Wins and Wins by Playing Position.

Miami Jai Alai provides its final standings sorted by the number worn by the player. It might be interesting to look at this in a couple of other ways. Below are two sorts that I did that might be more entertaining (and maybe a little more enlightening). The first is a simple win sort. The second is a win sort by player position (front or back court).

(January 2, 2017), Added player Erkiaga, who played a partial season at Miami Jai Alai. Many thanks to Tiger for the addition.

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins

Key:

Player--------------G-----W--P-S--W%--ITM--ITM%--Playing Position

Aritz 723 214 112 104 0.296 0.595 F

Irastorza         629 161 101 101 0.256 0.577 B

Cisneros         734 158 116 100 0.215 0.51   B

Bereikua         782 131 122 102 0.168 0.454 F

Ladutxe 741 129 99 111 0.174 0.457   B

======================================

Ricky 752 118 113 97 0.157 0.436 B

Jabi                685 112 83 89 0.164 0.415 F

Angel 740 110 115 91 0.149 0.427 F

Aldazabal        847 109 102 105 0.129 0.373 B

Rekalde 661 104 68 77 0.157 0.377 F

======================================


Jon                919 97 111 124 0.106 0.361 F

Aizpitarte 873 96 112 134 0.11  0.392 B

Tico              709 92 109 95 0.13    0.417 F

Luis              679 89 78 88 0.131 0.376 F

Garro 875 84 111 108 0.096 0.346 B

======================================


Tevin 733 83 97 79 0.113 0.353 F

Benat 623 78 83 70 0.125 0.371 F

Alejandro 768 77 86 90 0.100 0.329 B

Arriza 785 76 86 83 0.097 0.312 B

Enrique 795 75 87 75 0.094 0.298 F

======================================

Carlos 714 75 100 87 0.105 0.367 B

Santiso 692 74 80 76 0.107 0.332 B

Sierra II         797 72 77 100 0.09  0.312 B

Sierra 853 68 87 140 0.08   0.346 F

Areitio 526 66 69 69 0.125 0.388   F

======================================

Manuel 621 63 84 88 0.101 0.378 B

Zinkunegi 508 62 70 63 0.122 0.384F

Aitzol 527 59 57 56 0.112 0.326 F

Arrasate         470 52 66 55 0.111 0.368 F

Spinner 603 49 50 71 0.081 0.282 B

======================================


Chauderon 554 45 61 55 0.081 0.291 B

Duke 285 41 29 31 0.144 0.354 B

Guisasola 670 39 50 69 0.058 0.236 B

Goenaga 653 29 65 60 0.044 0.236 F

Aizarna 409 25 42 54 0.061 0.296 F

======================================

Ubilla              332 21 51 36 0.063 0.325 B

Erkiaga          53 7 11 7  0.132 0.472 B

====================================
====================================

Here are the full standings, sorted by wins by position

Key:

Player--------------G-----W--P-S--W%--ITM--ITM%--Playing Position

Front Court

Aritz 723 214 112 104 0.296 0.595 F

Bereikua         782 131 122 102 0.168 0.454 F

Jabi                685 112 83 89 0.164 0.415 F

Angel 740 110 115 91 0.149 0.427 F

Rekalde 661 104 68 77 0.157 0.377 F

======================================

Jon                919 97 111 124 0.106 0.361 F

Tico              709 92 109 95 0.13    0.417 F

Luis              679 89 78 88 0.131 0.376 F

Tevin 733 83 97 79 0.113 0.353 F

Benat 623 78 83 70 0.125 0.371 F

======================================

Enrique 795 75 87 75 0.094 0.298 F

Sierra 853 68 87 140 0.08   0.346 F

Areitio 526 66 69 69 0.125 0.388   F

Zinkunegi 508 62 70 63 0.122 0.384 F

Aitzol 527 59 57 56 0.112 0.326 F

======================================

Arrasate         470 52 66 55 0.111 0.368 F

Goenaga 653 29 65 60 0.044 0.236 F

Aizarna 409 25 42 54 0.061 0.296 F

-------------------------------------------------------------

Back Court

Irastorza         629 161 101 101 0.256 0.577 B

Cisneros          734 158 116 100 0.215 0.51    B

Ladutxe 741 129 99 111 0.174 0.457     B

Ricky 752 118 113 97 0.157 0.436 B

Aldazabal        847 109 102 105 0.129 0.373 B

======================================

Aizpitarte 873 96 112 134 0.11  0.392 B

Garro 875 84 111 108 0.096 0.346 B

Alejandro 768 77 86 90 0.100 0.329 B

Arriza 785 76 86 83 0.097 0.312 B

Carlos 714 75 100 87 0.105 0.367 B

======================================

Santiso 692 74 80 76 0.107 0.332 B

Sierra II          797 72 77 100 0.09  0.312 B

Manuel 621 63 84 88 0.101 0.378 B

Spinner 603 49 50 71 0.081 0.282 B

Chauderon 554 45 61 55 0.081 0.291 B

======================================

Duke 285 41 29 31 0.144 0.354 B

Guisasola 670 39 50 69 0.058 0.236    B

Ubilla              332 21 51 36 0.063 0.325   B

Erkiaga           53  7   11  7   0.132 0.472   B

Back to the update